> > > > What would you prefer doepfer to > > release?the buchla 259-style complex > > vco (that tracks right only for about 4 > > octaves)OR,an expansion module for the > > A111 triangle output that will feature > > all the buchla 259 waveshaping > > functions? > > > > o BUCHLA 259 VCO MODULE WITH ABOUT ONLY 4 OCTAVES PROPER KEYBOARD > TRACKING. > > o A111 EXPANSION MODULE WITH ALL BUCHLA 259 WAVESHAPING > FUNCTIONS. i recall peter g commenting on how using the triangle as original source of other wave forms has a strong influence on the 259's character. would it even matter in this regard that the proposed expander's triangle is actually derived from a sine? guess what i'm really wondering is does it even matter where the triangle comes from? also, in general i prefer to have access to an instrument's limits (to the point it begins to malfunction). seems that the 4 octave range would be better suited for enjoying this type of behavior/abuse. as is often the case w modern instruments, i'm afraid much of the magic may be lost to over-engineering.
Message
Re: New poll for Doepfer_a100
2004-08-05 by ps_minor
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.