Doepfer

hello UF,
that's right!
bakis.




--- unknown freak <vogelscheiss@vogelscheiss.com>
wrote:

> And if you're working from an analog sequencer
> strict tracking doesn't
> matter at all, much less diving off into something
> weirder.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mritenburg [mailto:mritenburg@yahoo.com] 
> > Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 9:45 AM
> > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: New poll for
> Doepfer_a100
> > 
> > 
> > > > advantage of the a111 expansion module in
> combination
> > > > to the a111 triangle output would be,for sure,
> the
> > > > better tracking.(i think the a111+expander
> combi will
> > > > track for 7 or more octaves ,as the a111 does,
> and not
> > > > for only 4 octaves)
> > > > as for the sound and exact features compared
> to the
> > > > buchla 259,i don't know yet.
> > > > bakis.
> > 
> > 
> > Having first hand experience with Buchla 259s, I
> will just say that 
> > tracking is not everything.  There are features to
> the design, range 
> > and performance of the 259 that far outweigh any
> short comings in 
> > tracking.  As Peter Grenader points out for his
> VCO based on the 
> > Buchla 258 "It's designed use is more geared
> toward 'what goes up, 
> > may go sideways' electronic music and not so much
> for realizing your 
> > favorite Bach tocatta. There are scads of VCOs on
> the market for this 
> > already. While they may track to a larger range,
> cannot conjure the 
> > timbral pleasures of the Model 15." 
> > 
> > I say vote for the 259!
> > 
> > Matthew
> > 
> 
> 


=====
Bakis Siros
Parallel Worlds / Polariton
Athens-Greece
[Doepfer_a100] group owner
http://www.shimarecords.co.uk
http://www.ward12.com


		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail