Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

RE: [Doepfer_a100] Re: polyphonic a100

2004-08-10 by Zoran Bosnjak

My guess on this topic:

it might sound pretty good with A-109 filter (like Microwave). I created 
complex, evolving sound, but only 1 voice. Than I overdubbed in Cubase to 
get the chord, and this was the only time my Doepfer started to get close to 
those glorious polyphonic synths of the past. Which means it can be done, 
but it would be very expensive.
So, if I need chords, I use Yamaha TX7 ($ 50 CAN), and than I filter it 
through Doepfer. A-109 sounds sweet enough, and Doepfer CV modulation  
capabilities are good reason to have a rack of Doepfer CV mutilating modules 
alone.
Or I use pitch shift option on my Digitech Studio Quad.
Of course, this will not sound like CS-80, but somehow it still beats 
digital synths. It simply sounds funkier, and more "organic".

Regards

Zoran


>From: "selfoscillate" <synaptic_music@yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
>To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: polyphonic a100
>Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:31:03 -0000
>
> >
> > rgds
> >
> > Pierre
> >
> > p.s. Ingo - thanks for the response about the a133 and
>rectification.  It's
> > exactly these sorts of possibilities that keep me wanting more
>modules
> > rather than pretty keyboards :)
>
>
>hello pierre,
>
>yes, me too. i haven't bought a polyphonic synth keyboard for
>a long time now, but i just can't stop buying more modules
>to make my modular more powerful. it's an obsession ;-)
>
>best wishes
>
>ingo
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Take advantage of powerful junk e-mail filters built on patented Microsoft� 
SmartScreen Technology. 
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines 
  Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN� Premium right now and get the 
first two months FREE*.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.