> So anyway, would you concider the AS VCOs and VCFs superior to Doepfer's? I > know this is one of the most subjective areas, hard to say before you can > actually hear them side by side... (guess its like the mac/pc discussion or > whatever) but neverthless I have heard much good bout the AS filters, being > meaty and well sorted in the lower frequencies especially, though some mean > they overdrive to easily.. > > /Anders hello anders, i like the a111's because they are very easy to set up (octave switch and perfect tracking due to the usage of the cem 3340 vco chip) and their linear fm capabilities. the rs95 has the advantage of adjustable waveshapes on every waveform, but tuning is not that easy as on the doepfer. my opinion is that especially the pulsewave of the rs95 sounds totally great, but the a111 has the better triangle waveform. so it is hard to say which is the better sounding one. all i can say is that i reach for my a111's more often, because of the ease of use. i don't have all asys filters (only rs500e, rs360, rs120), but i don't use them as often as my doepfer filters (i own all filters available from doepfer), so i cannot say anything about rs100 and rs110. there are some doepfer filters i really like. these are a108 (great sound, i love that bandpass output), a124 (for dirty stuff, great for drumloops), a105 (if i need self-oscillation for basslines at very low frequencies), a107 (for variety) and a127 (for filter animations). best wishes ingo
Message
Re: Integrator or Doepfer
2004-08-20 by selfoscillate
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.