Doepfer

hello andreas,
the density of the random cv events of the a149-1
depends on the incoming clock signal. so, the a149-1
can generate events with a wide rate range(much wider
than 30 sec to 1 min).
bakis.





--- Anders Ehlin <anders_ehlin@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Ingo!
> 
> Yeah the 149 seems to be the most versatile, I'll
> check how much space I 
> have left, haven't ordered yet.. :-) But do you know
> how low density on the 
> signals you can derive from it, If I want to get
> changes in the area between 
> 30 secs and 1 minute or so..? And how does the 117
> and 118 compare on this? 
> I can't find any info on this in the manuals, more
> than that the slew 
> limiter can smoothen a signal with up to 10 seconds.
> 
> Thanks a lot!/Anders
> 
> 
> >From: "selfoscillate" <synaptic_music@yahoo.com>
> >Reply-To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> >To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: random!!
> >Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:07:08 -0000
> >
> >
> >hello anders,
> >
> >the a117 digital noise module only outputs gate
> signals
> >with the same level, so it is mainly for triggering
> >other modules or for use as a noise source.
> >
> >the a118 gives smooth random voltages, but you
> can't control
> >the randomness via cv. this is a good application
> for
> >the a149-1, where randomness and the appearance of
> random
> >events can be controlled with voltages and gates,
> but the
> >voltage changes are not smooth, so you should add a
> >slew limiter here. a vc slew limiter gives even
> more
> >control over the smoothness of the random events.
> >
> >from my point of view the combination of a149-1 and
> >a171 is best, because it gives the most control.
> >
> >the a118 is an alternative, if you want to save
> money and
> >rack space.
> >
> >best wishes
> >
> >ingo
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Anders Ehlin"
> ><anders_ehlin@h...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi guys!
> > >
> > > I can't descide what random module to go for, I
> aim at creating
> >long
> > > drones/soundscapes (mainly from incoming
> signals) that evolves very
> >slowly
> > > but "uncyclic", the random would for example
> triggering slow filter
> >events.
> > > I've looked at the 117 and 118 but the new
> contender 149-1 also
> >seems nice.
> > > Any suggestions? Should I get a slew limiter to
> soften the edges
> >even more?
> > >
> > > Thanks Anders
> > >
> > >
>
_________________________________________________________________
> > > Auktioner: Tj�na en hacka p� gamla prylar
> http://tradera.msn.se
> >
> 
>
_________________________________________________________________
> Chatt: Tr�ffa nya n�tkompisar p� Habbo Hotel 
> http://habbohotel.msn.se/habbo/sv/channelizer
> 
> 


=====
Bakis Siros
Parallel Worlds / Polariton
Athens-Greece
[Doepfer_a100] group owner
http://www.shimarecords.co.uk
http://www.ward12.com


	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail