In a message dated 2/13/2002 4:28:39 PM Eastern Standard Time, synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com writes: > I think > it is the better solution to use the filters of your > system. to all, for what it is worth, i have had good luck in the past using this sort of technique. on a previous modular synth i owned, i had 4 various state-variable type vcfs. i liked using them in parallel as a phaser ( comb filter ). i felt it had a different, "stronger" ( for lack of a better word ) sound than the same synths v.c. phaser module. for conventional comb filter effects beyond any companies v.c. phaser module requires going to something using analog delay chips. analogue systems makes such a module ( i have one and it works well for short delay times ) and blacet ( i`ve never used theirs but it is reputed to be very good ) are both currently available, just to name 2 quick examples. while an expansive product line is great, perhaps resources are better spent not re-inventing the wheel - ? - better to focus on things you can do well that other folks aren`t doing ! just my 2 cents worth.............. : ) best, dave [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] more info on the comb filter matter...from dieter.
2002-02-14 by davevosh@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.