Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

Re: [Doepfer_a100] MAQ 16/3 or A-154/5/6?

2004-10-07 by Bakis Sirros

hello kevin,
if you intend to build a modular synth,the a154,55,56
is the BEST!the answer is simple/:so many patchpoints
give countless creative capabilities.
on the other hand:if you want an analogue sequencer
for your analogue AND MIDI synths and for easy live
use then choose the maq16/3. the a154,55,56 combi can
be used to send micicontrol messages via the a191
module but cannot send midi note on/ off messages. so
the a154,55,56 combi cannot be used to drive a midi
synth. unless of course you have a cv/gate to midi
converter.(not available, yet, as an a100 module).
bakis.





--- klstay <kevinstay@earthlink.net> wrote:

> 
> I am trying to decide between a MAQ 16/3 or an
> A-154, A-155, and A-
> 156. (Eventually a second A-155) Space is not a
> constraint and I 
> would not mind routing the cables from the rear of
> the MAQ to a 
> drilled out blank panel. The cost differential is
> also not a factor. 
> Given that, which would people recommend and why?
> 
> 
> 
> 


=====
Bakis Siros
Parallel Worlds / Polariton
Athens-Greece
[Doepfer_a100] group owner
http://www.shimarecords.co.uk
http://www.ward12.com


		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.