hello kevin, if you intend to build a modular synth,the a154,55,56 is the BEST!the answer is simple/:so many patchpoints give countless creative capabilities. on the other hand:if you want an analogue sequencer for your analogue AND MIDI synths and for easy live use then choose the maq16/3. the a154,55,56 combi can be used to send micicontrol messages via the a191 module but cannot send midi note on/ off messages. so the a154,55,56 combi cannot be used to drive a midi synth. unless of course you have a cv/gate to midi converter.(not available, yet, as an a100 module). bakis. --- klstay <kevinstay@earthlink.net> wrote: > > I am trying to decide between a MAQ 16/3 or an > A-154, A-155, and A- > 156. (Eventually a second A-155) Space is not a > constraint and I > would not mind routing the cables from the rear of > the MAQ to a > drilled out blank panel. The cost differential is > also not a factor. > Given that, which would people recommend and why? > > > > ===== Bakis Siros Parallel Worlds / Polariton Athens-Greece [Doepfer_a100] group owner http://www.shimarecords.co.uk http://www.ward12.com __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] MAQ 16/3 or A-154/5/6?
2004-10-07 by Bakis Sirros
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.