--- Dieter Doepfer <hardware@doepfer.de> wrote: > From: "Dieter Doepfer" <hardware@doepfer.de> > To: "Bakis Sirros" <synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com> > Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: MAQ 16/3 or > A-154/5/6? > Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 16:44:36 +0200 > > > the only thing which is a bit sad about the a155's > is > > that the max voltage range is only 4 volts. ok for > a pure > > a100 system, but if you are using other modulars > as well, > > then 4 volts are not really suitable for all > purposes. > > As you probably guess.... > > the A-155 can be modified for higher voltages. The > sum of the resistor R9 > (27k in the upper row, 1k in the lower row) and the > potentiometer P9 (5k > trimming potentiometer in the upper row, 50k front > panel potentiometer in > the lower row) define the maximum output voltage. > They form the feedback > resistor of an inverting amplifier (see DIY page). > If R9 or P9 or both are > replaced by higher values the max. output voltage > can be adjusted to the > desired value (max. ~ 10V). But for higher voltages > it is very difficult to > adjust the knobs to semitones. This is why we > limited the upper row to 4V. > The lower row has already a maximum higher output > voltage (~ 6.5V). > > If desired we could add this modification to the DIY > page. > > Best wishes > Dieter Doepfer > > > > > ===== Bakis Siros Parallel Worlds / Polariton Athens-Greece [Doepfer_a100] group owner http://www.shimarecords.co.uk http://www.ward12.com _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com
Message
Fwd: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: MAQ 16/3 or A-154/5/6?(doepfer's answer)
2004-10-07 by Bakis Sirros
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.