Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Shortwave Radio (Dieter's comments) Re: Poll results for Doepfer_a100

2004-10-22 by richard

Thanks for the offer - I can cope with a circuit diagram up to a certain point.
Richard
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: timothy adams 
  To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 3:10 PM
  Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Shortwave Radio (Dieter's comments) Re: Poll results for Doepfer_a100


  Richard.....E-mail me....I think I can help...

  Kind Regards   Tim





  --- trebcavxx <richardbarton@caving5.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:

  > 
  > Well, that DID get a favourable response to the poll !
  > I'd build such a module for myself, incorporating a ready built SW 
  > radio, but I don't know how to make it VC on the tuning !
  > I've built a ring-modulator, a mixer and a joystick, but my 
  > electronics knowledge has its limits.
  > Richard
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Modular Fan <synthtrader@y...> 
  > wrote:
  > > hello,
  > > 
  > > << How about a poll about the VC short wave radio idea
  > > ? >>
  > > 
  > > Thanks, there was one and it was decently successful,
  > > I just decided to extend the conversation :)
  > > 
  > > Please see:
  > > http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/surveys?
  > id=11800722
  > > 
  > > I also have a little AM/FM radio sitting around. This
  > > is just as good an idea as a shortwave radio and would
  > > be sufficient for me. Mine is portable and has
  > > handles. The reception is average. It has a 1/8
  > > headphone output but its somewhat noisy and hard to
  > > get the levels to properly match the A-100. And
  > > unfortunately, before modification, no CV :(
  > > 
  > > I wrote Dieter about this and here is his reply (I
  > > think its OK to post to the list):
  > > 
  > > "I believe that this more a DIY project. Here in
  > > Germany one has to go through a very complicated and
  > > time-consuming admission process if one offers any
  > > product in the radio frequency range (especially radio
  > > receivers and transmitter). The charges are very high
  > > so that it makes no sense from my point of view to
  > > offer such a module. The only solution might be to buy
  > > a product that is licenced already and offer a kit to
  > > include this product into the A-100 (especially a
  > > suitable front panel with output socket,
  > > similar to the multimeter). In this case we were not
  > > responsible for the radio licence. But as a complete
  > > A-100 module it would make no sense."
  > > 
  > > So I can see the reasons why we may be stuck without
  > > this module. But the kit form is a good idea IMO!
  > >  
  > > Your thoughts?
  > > 
  > > Thanks,
  > > 
  > > Shawn Cleary
  > > schism@t...
  > > www.analoguehaven.com
  > > 
  > > 
  > >             
  > > __________________________________
  > > Do you Yahoo!?
  > > Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
  > > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 



              
  _______________________________
  Do you Yahoo!?
  Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
  http://vote.yahoo.com

        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
              ADVERTISEMENT
             
       
       


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Yahoo! Groups Links

    a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/
      
    b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      
    c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.