Doepfer

Thanks Florian.

My name is Olivier (smoo), I know your Name from "Keys" (I was once 
on a picture in the Keys...) BTW: Thanks for the PLL, love it.

The reason I am a bit suspicious with the Wave Multiplier is, that I 
have made not too good experiences with other Waveshapers. I have a 
dual Waveshaper in my Technosaurus Selector and this one is sooo 
subtle. Subtle can be good or really boring. Well, all my Waveshapers 
so far were boring. (I also have the Oakley Wavefolder). On the other 
hand, all the Serge I know told me that the one of the greatest Serge 
Module ever was the Multipliers. 

Thanks all the others for their answers.
Olivier



--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Florian Anwander 
<Florian.Anwander@c...> wrote:
> Hi waveform100 (btw I prefer to know the firstnames of persons I 
talk to...)
> 
> > I couldn't find anything about this module in the group. It looks 
> > very interesting. Is it any good? Comparable to the Serge 
Multipliers 
> > or the Ken Stone Wave Multiplier? 
> I do own it and I like it very much. There are a lot of possible 
sound 
> variations which can be done with only one module.
> 
> The sounds are created usually with a single vco (sine or triangle) 
fed 
> direct to the A137.
> Alternative:
> vco with saw -> lowpass with "dark" cutofffrequncy setting and 
increased 
> resonance -> A137
> 
> It is useful to modulate not to many parameters; I usually have one 
> parameter, that I modulate manually or with LFO, and another 
parameter I 
> modulate with an envelope.
> 
> The sound comes close to hardsync stuf or distorted filters. 
Sometimes 
> it remembers to phase modulation synthesis.
> 
> 
> Florian