Wouldn't a stand-alone TKB hopefully early 2005 plus a desktop style frame for controller modules later in 2005 suit us all?! As Florian pointed out to place controller modules vertically isn't very handy. Regards, Ingo a.k.a. --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "selfoscillate" <synaptic_music@y...> wrote: > > > hello florian and oliver, > > ok, the suggestion of a separate case is not bad. > i don't like the idea of a tkb with space for modules, > but a case with space for a tkb and modules is another > thing. > > best wishes > > ingo > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Florian Anwander > <Florian.Anwander@c...> wrote: > > Hi Oliver > > > > > i just wanted to share some thoughts on the TKB. how about a TKB > > > with the possiblility to put some doepfer modules in it. it > should > > > have place for maybe 6-8 modules enough for a minimodular system. > i > > Uuuhmm, I already made a similar suggestion a year ago or so. > > I'd like to have a desktop style frame, that could hold either two > rows > > of modules or any kind of keyboard (TKB or stupid simple CV/Gate) > in the > > lower row and modules in the upper row. It could look like a Roland > > System 100 or an ARP Odyssey > > > > It would give a possibility to place some modules like Theremin, > Light > > beam (as existing examples) or ModWheel-Source, Joystick (as > examples to > > be developped), which are not very handsome in a vertical frame. > > > > Florian
Message
Re: the new TKB as minimodular?
2004-12-16 by ilanode
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.