I thought that soft sync had to be driven with square wave, just like hard sync. Your comment is making me realize I made a pretty big mistake. Zoran >From: Josue Arias <josue.arias@gmail.com> >Reply-To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com >To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Soft Sync on A111 >Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:39:29 +0100 > >Hi Zoran, >hmmm, ..and what is the question? >sync is driven using saw waves as is must to and then performs as it >should.... > >Best Regards, > >Josue. > >On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 19:26:38 +0000, Zoran Bosnjak <dj_allin@hotmail.com> >wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I just had to share this with the list: I tried to set up soft sync >between > > two A-111s, by driving one with the square wave of the other. Result was > > that the pitch was wrong on almost every second note (almost like >partial > > SOU). Than I tried saw wave... > > > > Saw wave drives slave A111 perfectly! And the sound is just so right, > > usually finding perfect sweet spot after playing with octave switch on >both > > for a half minute. Try this! > > > > Regards, > > > > Zoran > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > >
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Soft Sync on A111
2005-02-05 by Zoran Bosnjak
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.