hello zoran, just some additional info about the a109 vca. the a109 vca has a combined response curve, you can also find this information in the a109 user manual. from 0 to +200 mv the response curve is exponential (+200 mv is approximately -20 db). from +200 mv to +5 v the response is linear, +5 v is 0 db or unity gain. best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Zoran Bosnjak" <dj_allin@h...> wrote: > > Thanks for the excellent response Ingo. Everybody reading this post, please > notice that after all, it is only my perception that by bypassing VCA > entirely in my bass patch, the A-109 filter got its character improved by > getting slighly smoother, almost liquidy quality. Almost like VCA was > holding it back - now its more even (smooth). When I am saying more even, > imagine curve of the sound as being curved (obvious), but no dents in the > line. With VCA, it is almost like curve is dented, uneven, with slight > changes in volume. I did the test by opening the AMP knob on A-109 > completely. I could even hear slight noise (but negligible, and remember > that's with AMP knob open full, and no envelope applied). > What manfacturers do with their chip/filter application is still mystery to > me. This is my third encounter with the same chip - I also have Microwave I, > and I used to own Waldorf pole filter (forgot the name, that small orange > thing). And that Waldorf standalone filter unit sounded unbelievable > (smoothness and acid of 303 if needed, but with different, almost Moog > character. Almost like subtle reverb was applied to it). I sold it because > it was slow to edit, due to its menu system, and guess what: it was sticking > out too much in the mix (beauty is curse sometimes :-) But this Waldorf > experience made me buy A-109, and I KNEW there was that beautifull character > hidden somewhere (behind VCA :-) > > But your post is eye-opening Ingo. I will look for other implementations > where A-109 VCA can contribute to character, and not take away. And it's > just unbelievable how little detail can contribute lot to sound, > > Regards, > > Zoran > > > > >From: "selfoscillate" <synaptic_music@y...> > >Reply-To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > >To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > >Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A-109 Improvement > >Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:47:53 -0000 > > > > > > > >hello zoran, > > > >well, i don't think that the vca is low quality, > >it just has a different response curve. the vca-part > >of the a109 has a clear sound with low distortion > >and low noise, so it can't be named low quality. > >low quality usually means that the vca is noisy. > >the response curve of the a109 vca is partly linear > >and partly exponential, depending on the amount > >of voltage applied to the vca circuit via the cv inputs > >and/or the gain pot. this is a somewhat different behaviour > >than on the other vca's and probably what you don't like, > >especially when you use an envelope or lfo to open the vca, > >instead of using a fixed voltage. > > > >also it seems to be a question of personal taste. > >some like the cem-based vca's, others prefer the ca3080-based > >or even the vactrol-based vca's, which have a completely > >different response curve. my opinion is that each type > >of vca has it's advantages, you just have to find the > >right application for it. > > > >best wishes > > > >ingo > > > > > > > > > >--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Zoran Bosnjak" <dj_allin@h...> > >wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I read so many posts about A-109 that were saying "this module is > >good for > > > starters, you get decent filter, VCA, and panner." Well, this is > >what I > > > found out: this filter sounds better when used without VCA that is > >the part > > > of the same module. Without VCA on A-109, the filter becomes very > >smooth - > > > it is a small difference, but possible to hear. And because of that > > > smoothness, suddenly this filter has a strength/beauty in a mix > >that was not > > > present before. > > > > > > I was just patching some bass sounds (VCO, A-109 filer, and > >envelope), and > > > comparing them with ARP Axxe that I own as well. What I like about > >A-109 > > > filter is a sweet tone, mellow Curtis with very tiny hint of Moog. > >Still > > > sounding harder than super smooth and round ARP Axxe (mine has 4075 > >filter, > > > one that got replicated in Modcan line of modules). > > > > > > So, two conclusions: A-109 filter is more than "just decent", it's > >actually > > > very good. And by getting the module, you are getting low quality > >VCA, that > > > can impact your sound (well, you can always find CV duty for VCA on > >your > > > system). I would love to hear if somebody has experience similar > >(or > > > completely different, of course) to mine. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Zoran > > > > > >
Message
Re: A-109 Improvement
2005-04-07 by selfoscillate
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.