hello gustaf, my choice for a starter vocoder would be 1x a129/1 1x a129/2 1x a129/3 in my opinion the voiced/unvoiced module can be omitted in most cases. the slew limiter module a129/3 is cool because you'll probably want to attenuate a few bands (i want that all the time) and for that you don't need the slew controller module. later you should consider adding another two a129/3 and the a129/4 controller, the a129/5 being the final addition. a long time ago i owned a svc350 and i sold it for the a129 vocoder. the doepfer vocoder has a very clean sound compared with the svc350. the svc350 is not very versatile soundwise because it has a strong character. the a129 is a lot more neutral and therefore you can use it for a wider variety of sounds. best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "gargar1974" <gustaf@p...> wrote: > hello, > I'm thinking about getting the vocoder modules. > > A full vocoder is six modules, > A-129/1 + A-129/2 and 3 of A-129/3 slew limiters with A-129/4 slew > controller and A-129/5 voiced/unvoiced detector. > > But, it is quite expensive and takes up more than half of a G6... > > So, does any other configurations make sense? > Can I use the vocoder without the slew limiters? > Without the voiced/unvoiced? > > Does anyone on the list use the vocoder without all six modules? > Can you make anything useful out of just the A-129/1 analysis and A- > 129/2 synthesis section? > > My experience with analog vocoders are the Roland SVC-350 and the > Korg VC-10. (besides som virtual analog and software that i usually > find boring). > > How would you compare the Doepfer vocoder system to the SVC-350? > > Thankful for any buying tips from a-129 users! > > /gustaf
Message
Re: Is the A-129 vocoder usable with fewer than all six modules?
2005-05-10 by selfoscillate
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.