Doepfer

hello heinz,

i really like that idea. if a poll is created about a
cs30 filter, i'd probably say "yes, i want one", but it
wouldn't be of any priority, because we have so many
filters already. a poll about a delay-module would
get the same answer from me, but the delay module would
stand on top of my list, because there is no such module
in the doepfer range at all. but well, at least dieter has
to decide which module comes next.

new polls are good, but i cannot stress enough that there
are already a lot of pre-announced modules which still
have to be developed. in my opinion these should get
priority.

best wishes

ingo



--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "pater lacrymarum" 
<heinz.blasnik@a...> wrote:
> I had similar thoughts already as well. 
> a possible solution would be to ask group members in a separate poll
> to rank the modules that have received a 'yes' majority according to
> their preferences. 
> 
> best regards,
> 
> heinz
> 
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Tommy DOG" <mrsvomit@t...>
> wrote:
> > Just my opinion..
> > 
> > Often I have the feeling some people vote "yes" for any new module
> without considering 
> > the fact that they may cause a module they wish for more to be
> delayed.
> > -Perhaps this is only my fear and it is not correct.
> > 
> > I try to only say "yes" or "no" and consider what will make the
> A-100 even more expansive 
> > then any other system. I hope others think about their votes as
> well. I would hate to see 
> > years on "clone" modules and clappers come out because people said
> "yes" to any idea.
> > 
> > TD