Doepfer

hello,
yes, dieter, i would prefer the single module too.
maybe you could label one as A188-1a and the other
A188-1b to avoid confusion.
bakis.






--- ilanode <techmeier@web.de> wrote:

> For a guitar stomp box a switch to change eg btn
> chorus and flanger 
> is a good and common idea. For a modular synth an
> independent delay 
> which can be combined with another independent one
> makes much more 
> sense. Regards, Ingo
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Dieter
> Doepfer" 
> <hardware@d...> wrote:
> >
> > The preliminary information of the BBD module has
> been updated. I 
> think that
> > the main features of the module are defined in the
> meantime. But 
> there is
> > one thing that leaded to internal discussions in
> the company and 
> I'd like to
> > hear your comments:
> > 
> > Should we manufacture a single module similar to
> the prototype 
> shown on the
> > page with 2048 or 1024 stages BBD (can be chosen
> by the customer 
> in his
> > order). The pc board will be designed for both
> types which are 
> unfortunately
> > not compatible.
> > 
> > Or do you prefer a double module with both BBDs on
> the module. Both
> > solutions have advantages and disadvantages. The
> main advantage of 
> the
> > single module is the lower price. But one would
> need two of these 
> modules to
> > have both time ranges available (down to 7ms or
> 2,5ms resp.). The 
> advantage
> > of the dual module would be the lower price if
> both time ranges 
> are required
> > simultaneously (compared to two single modules),
> and the mixing
> > possibilities of both BBD sections. But the lower
> price is 
> attainable only
> > if the module contains only one HSVCO for both
> BBDs. Otherwise the 
> price of
> > the double module will be nearly the same as for
> two single 
> modules.
> > 
> > I'd prefer the single version (though I voted for
> the double 
> version in the
> > past ...).
> > 
> > I can't wait to see your comments. Bakis, maybe
> you could start a 
> poll (very
> > simple: single or double module prefered).
> > 
> > Best wishes
> > Dieter Doepfer
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > > [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]Im Auftrag
> von Florian 
> Anwander
> > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. November 2005 14:51
> > > An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > > Betreff: Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: ring
> modulators - new 
> examples
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Dieter and Ingo
> > >
> > >
> > > >>I think I'll get the tools out of the box,
> Peter's mod sounds 
> niceeee!
> > > >>I was quite surprised about the A133 example,
> very cool that 
> it sounds
> > > >>so similar to the A114.
> > > > Even I'm very surprised as completely
> different circuits are
> > > used. The A-114
> > > > uses the balanced modulator MC1496 (normally
> for high frequency
> > > > applications), the A-133 a LM13700 Dual OTA
> design.
> > > I think this is valid only for the very simple
> sources of the 
> first
> > > example. Also a resonating VCF crossmodulated by
> a sine VCO 
> won't sound
> > > much different.
> > > The example with the TR-808 and the continuous
> sound from the 
> korg shows
> > > clearly the difference between the 114 and the
> 133.
> > >
> > > Florian
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Bakis Sirros
Parallel Worlds
Athens-Greece
[Doepfer_a100] group owner
http://www.shimarecords.co.uk
http://www.rubber.gr


		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com