Doepfer

again, the old cables look cheaper to me.
the quality of the new ones is clearly better!

--- selfoscillate <synaptic_music@yahoo.com> wrote:

> 
> hello adam-v,
> 
> heavy shielding is not necessary for patchcords,
> there is
> no benefit, it is even the other way around.
> most important are that the jacks fit safely into
> the sockets
> and that the cables are light-weight. heavy
> shielding will lead to
> a heavier patchcord , causing additional stress to
> the sockets,
> and thats what you do not want.
> 
> so for the purpose of patching your modular, the new
> cables should
> be equally good or even better than the old ones,
> even if they
> look cheaper.
> 
> best wishes
> 
> ingo
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Adam-V"
> <adam-v@...> wrote:
> >
> > Just received some of the new cables in my latest
> order from Doepfer 
> > and I have to say I am very disappointed in the
> quality. The old 
> > cables were nice and flexible and seemed to be of
> a nice high quality 
> > wire whereas the new ones use quite stiff shielded
> cable which makes 
> > them look rather cheap.
> > 
> > Can anyone recommend another source for high
> quality colour coded 
> > 3.5mm mono cables? I do have a reel of high
> quality shielded cable 
> > that is the right size for 3.5mm plugs just
> hanging around; perhaps I 
> > am better off not bothering with colour coded
> cables and just 
> > soldering up my own cables.
> > 
> > Anybody else here similarly disappointed? Am I
> being hypercritical?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Adam-V
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds
[Doepfer_a100] group owner
http://www.parallel-worlds-music.com
http://www.shimarecords.co.uk
http://www.rubber.gr
Athens-Greece

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com