Doepfer

In a message dated 3/3/2002 3:30:23 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com writes:


> that might mean that the pulse waveform from the a111
> isn't perfect square???



bakis,
whether perfectly square or a pulse shouldn`t matter, i would think, as the 
circuitry should fire on the leading edge.
i recall that the a115 audio divider was picky about the a111 pulse output, 
too.
weirder..........
best,
dave




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> > that might mean that the pulse waveform from the a111
> > isn't perfect square???

> i recall that the a115 audio divider was picky about the a111 
pulse output, 
> too.

yes, as well as the A113..

luckily i discovered this before buying a111s.  no probs w AS 
vcos, everything tracks the pulse very well, including 155 as 
graphic vco.  (and i think dieter's estimate of 10kHz ceiling is 
accurate)

to switch gears real quick, i agree w joe on his argument for 
need for improvements, and the a111 pulse output would be a 
good place to start.   
duff

hi dave,


roland mayer once told me that for the a155 clock
input to work right needs a perfect pulse with sharp
sguare egdes....
i guess that explains it all....
bakis.



--- davevosh@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 3/3/2002 3:30:23 AM Eastern
> Standard Time, 
> synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com writes:
> 
> 
> > that might mean that the pulse waveform from the
> a111
> > isn't perfect square???
> 
> 
> 
> bakis,
> whether perfectly square or a pulse shouldn`t
> matter, i would think, as the 
> circuitry should fire on the leading edge.
> i recall that the a115 audio divider was picky about
> the a111 pulse output, 
> too.
> weirder..........
> best,
> dave
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
> 
> 


=====
synthfreak(parallel worlds)
athens-greece
[Doepfer_a100] group owner-moderator

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - sign up for Fantasy Baseball
http://sports.yahoo.com