I think is a matter of opinions but the "most perfect" waveform is not the
most musical or good sounding wave... for example I preffer the A-110 over
the A-111 everytime, the CEM based A111 would be very useful for low drift
aplications or when purer waves are needed but the sound is not musical, it
lacks the magic.
I have tons of different VCOs but comparing just the ones in doepfer format
here is my preference:
1. PlanB Model15
2. AS RS90
3. A110
4. A111
Counting all other VCOs I have, my first choice for the best sounding (or
more musical and "live" sounding) is the EMS Synthi VCO, followed by the
driscoll modular VCOs, serge VCOs and the roland system-100 VCOs.
Josue.
2006/5/15, Dubshot <dubshot@xs4all.nl>:
>
>
> that wasn't me :-)))
>
> Anton
>
> > please excuse me, but how can you say that the buchla 259
> > sounds 20 times better than other vco's then?
> > you cannot judge what you haven't heard, no?
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Dubshot" <dubshot@...> wrote:
> >>
> >> don't know, i never heard one, is it different from the a-111?
> >>
> >> > ok, know i understand that term better.
> >> > i'm just curious, how would you describe the
> >> > basic sound of a buchla 259 compared to other vco's?
> >> >
> >> > best wishes
> >> >
> >> > ingo
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Dubshot" <dubshot@> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> you can say the a-111 sounds better than the a-110 (but not 20
> >> > times :-)
> >> >> by just comparing the 'basic' waveforms, but the basic sound of
> > the
> >> > model
> >> >> 15 and the a-111 is more or less identical. the model 15 fm is
> > more
> >> >> extreme than the a-111, but not really a *lot* more versatile in
> > a
> >> > musical
> >> >> sense. the polarizers are very nice, the morph isn't really
> >> > spectacular
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> > it depends upon what you do with the vco.
> >> >> > the plan b model 15 can sound totally different
> >> >> > compared to an a111, and vice versa.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > what does "not better" mean for you?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Dubshot" <dubshot@>
> > wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> It's good, but not 'better' than the A-111
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > Have a look at the Plan B VCO, it's based on a Buchla design
> >> > and
> >> >> > is a
> >> >> >> > fantastic VCO.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > David Salter
> >> >> >> > Senior Project Manager
> >> >> >> > Reuters Ltd
> >> >> >> > Tel +44 20 7542 2402
> >> >> >> > Mob +44 7990562402
> >> >> >> > email david.salter@
> >> >> >> > RM david.salter.reuters@
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > ________________________________
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> >> >> > [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]
> >> >> >> > On Behalf Of heritage_flowline
> >> >> >> > Sent: 13 May 2006 11:44
> >> >> >> > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> >> >> >> > Subject: [Doepfer_a100] buchla 259 is the best oscillator
> > ever
> >> >> > made why
> >> >> >> > doesnt doepfer clone it?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Anyone who has heard this oscillator will know that it is at
> >> >> > least 20
> >> >> >> > times better than any other oscillator.
> >> >> >> > Ive heard just about every oscillator out there
> > inc ,serge,plan
> >> >> >> > b ,cynthias thru zero,arp2500,2600,synthi 100, and it beats
> >> > them
> >> >> > all
> >> >> >> > easily so im presuming the only reason it hasnt been done is
> >> >> > because
> >> >> >> > you dont know about it so mr dopefer I know you should make
> > it
> >> >> > your
> >> >> >> > business to check it out your a100 system is going from
> >> > strength
> >> >> >> > strength and if you pulled this off you had have the most
> >> > enviable
> >> >> >> > modular module ever.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > SPONSORED LINKS
> >> >> >> > Electronic air filter
> >> >> >> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
> >> >> > t=ms&k=Electronic+air+filter&w1=Electronic
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> > +air+filter&w2=A100&w3=Midi+converter&w4=Modular+system&w5=Module&c=5&
> >> >> > s=
> >> >> >> > 89&.sig=4z4o_X8-pJMV_ZkWpcUzfQ> A100
> >> >> >> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
> >> >> > t=ms&k=A100&w1=Electronic+air+filter&w2=A1
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> > 00&w3=Midi+converter&w4=Modular+system&w5=Module&c=5&s=89&.sig=vkZk9oM
> >> >> > wS
> >> >> >> > YA6JVt7jMKACg> Midi converter
> >> >> >> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
> >> >> > t=ms&k=Midi+converter&w1=Electronic+air+fi
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> > lter&w2=A100&w3=Midi+converter&w4=Modular+system&w5=Module&c=5&s=89&.s
> >> >> > ig
> >> >> >> > =8wIjtHrgvO_CLHjOsXjwXA>
> >> >> >> > Modular system
> >> >> >> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
> >> >> > t=ms&k=Modular+system&w1=Electronic+air+fi
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> > lter&w2=A100&w3=Midi+converter&w4=Modular+system&w5=Module&c=5&s=89&.s
> >> >> > ig
> >> >> >> > =k_-XvCuWrHEHytqPA5h6eQ> Module
> >> >> >> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
> >> >> > t=ms&k=Module&w1=Electronic+air+filter&w2=
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> > A100&w3=Midi+converter&w4=Modular+system&w5=Module&c=5&s=89&.sig=wsqwV
> >> >> > mN
> >> >> >> > _jTYb6sPVmjGuHg>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > ________________________________
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > * Visit your group "Doepfer_a100
> >> >> >> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100> " on the web.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >> >> >> > Doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >> >> >> > <mailto:Doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?
> >> >> > subject=Unsubscribe>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> >> > Terms of
> >> >> >> > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > ________________________________
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Any views expressed in this message are those of the
> > individual
> >> >> > sender,
> >> >> >> > except where the sender specifically states them to be the
> >> > views
> >> >> > of
> >> >> >> > Reuters Ltd.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]