Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Thread

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] RE: AW: a1065 SEM filter

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] RE: AW: a1065 SEM filter

2007-03-21 by synchro1

as-is, monophonic.  Please.

I first saw this at NAMM in Jan. 2006 - Dieter, I am the fellow that bugged you for long periods of time at that NAMM and used to work for the US EMS distributor (EMSA) in the late 70s.

I really, really want this.  And I never expected it to be anything but monophonic.

Thanks,  Keep up the great work, my wall of modular continues to grow and Doepfer occupies most of it.

-----Original Message-----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>From: hardware@doepfer.de
>Sent: Mar 21, 2007 9:24 AM
>To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] RE: AW: a1065 SEM filter
>
>> And what about the Doepfer (Touch) Keyboard?
>>
>> David Westling
>
>I have been waiting already for this question :-)
>
>This is the current state: the TBK is working in principle (e.g. the Sonic
>State NAMM video 2006) but we we are not really pleased with the
>functionality as the working principle we use (hum noise detection) allows
>only monophonic applications. It is not possible to touch a second or third
>key for polphonic application. Actually we wanted to built a polyphonic
>device but  we could not realize that with the hum noise principle. So we
>have two alternatives: publish the TKB as it is or start the design from the
>beginning with another basic principle. In the first case the TKB could be
>publishes within 2-3 months as only the case has to be made. The electronics
>is working. If we have to start again I don't know how long it will take
>until the polyphonic version will work as it should. Another principle would
>be the measurement of the skin resistance of the fingers. But for this
>solution one has to touch an area of each "key" that has a copper structure
>like two nested combs very exactly.
>
>I think we will decide after the Frankfurt show how we continue.
>
>Best wishes
>Dieter Doepfer
>
>
>
> 
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] RE: AW: a1065 SEM filter

2007-03-21 by Bakis Sirros

hello Dieter,
yes, bring it mono, as it is now!
if we have to wait for a poly version, then we do not
know for how long it will stay in the development
stage, right?   ;-)
best regards,
Bakis.


--- synchro1 <synchro1@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> as-is, monophonic.  Please.
> 
> I first saw this at NAMM in Jan. 2006 - Dieter, I am
> the fellow that bugged you for long periods of time
> at that NAMM and used to work for the US EMS
> distributor (EMSA) in the late 70s.
> 
> I really, really want this.  And I never expected it
> to be anything but monophonic.
> 
> Thanks,  Keep up the great work, my wall of modular
> continues to grow and Doepfer occupies most of it.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: hardware@doepfer.de
> >Sent: Mar 21, 2007 9:24 AM
> >To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] RE: AW: a1065 SEM
> filter
> >
> >> And what about the Doepfer (Touch) Keyboard?
> >>
> >> David Westling
> >
> >I have been waiting already for this question :-)
> >
> >This is the current state: the TBK is working in
> principle (e.g. the Sonic
> >State NAMM video 2006) but we we are not really
> pleased with the
> >functionality as the working principle we use (hum
> noise detection) allows
> >only monophonic applications. It is not possible to
> touch a second or third
> >key for polphonic application. Actually we wanted
> to built a polyphonic
> >device but  we could not realize that with the hum
> noise principle. So we
> >have two alternatives: publish the TKB as it is or
> start the design from the
> >beginning with another basic principle. In the
> first case the TKB could be
> >publishes within 2-3 months as only the case has to
> be made. The electronics
> >is working. If we have to start again I don't know
> how long it will take
> >until the polyphonic version will work as it
> should. Another principle would
> >be the measurement of the skin resistance of the
> fingers. But for this
> >solution one has to touch an area of each "key"
> that has a copper structure
> >like two nested combs very exactly.
> >
> >I think we will decide after the Frankfurt show how
> we continue.
> >
> >Best wishes
> >Dieter Doepfer
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 


Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
[Doepfer_a100] group owner
http://www.parallel-worlds-music.com
http://www.myspace.com/parallelworldsmusic
http://www.myspace.com/interconnectedmusic
http://www.DiN.org.uk
http://www.shimarecords.co.uk
http://www.rubber.gr
Athens-Greece


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. 
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.