Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Thread

Creating a Virtual Oberheim 2 or 4-Voice

Creating a Virtual Oberheim 2 or 4-Voice

2008-04-13 by J. Talbert

Hi, folks!

I haven't posted here much since I came here for advice on purchasing 
my first A100 modules.  But I can happily say that my A100 has grown 
quite a since those first 12 modules you guys helped me pick!  So 
here's what I'm hoping someone here can help me with now...

Ever since Joe Zawinul appeared on the cover of Keyboard magazine  
decades ago with his Oberheim 8-voice, I've had an intense desire to 
own at least a 2 or 4-voice.  However, I'd rather not spend the kind 
of money these things are going for these days (especially given 
their age).  So my crazy quest is to try and patch something that can 
sound reasonably similar on an A100 and *maybe* even a Nord Modular 
G2 or G1 (yeah I know they're not analog, but it's really just for 
fun in that case).  Unfortunately, I can't find the sound of a raw 
SEM.  I believe I've already got the necessary A100 modules and of 
course the Nord Modulars have an endless number of modules to build 
from.  What I'm hoping someone can provide are short WAV recordings 
of:

- Note (single voice) with saw, square and pulse waveforms
- Note with a slowly opening and then closing filter (no resonance)
- Note with a slowly opening and then closing filter (mid resonance)
- Note with a slowly opening and then closing filter (full resonance)
- Filter only (self resonating)

I would also like a brief description of how voice allocation works 
on a 2, 4 or 8 voice in terms of how SEM banks are assigned. And of 
course, if there are other quirks that this instrument has which 
contribute to it's sound that I might need to know about, please 
include that information as well (like envelope behavior, sequencer 
strangeness, etc.)

I hope this all isn't too much to ask, but I'd really like to have a 
proper reference point before I embark down this path.  Of course, 
even if what I'm attempting is absolutely not possible to come close 
to, I can appreciate that feedback as well - just know then that you 
may be sending me into great debt as I try to get hold of a real 
Oberheim 4-voice!  :-)

Also, if someone here can make the recordings but need a place to 
host them, I can set up an FTP location.  If the files can be 
compressed with WinRAR, that should greatly reduce the file size.

Thanks!

Kindest regards,
John

Best module to accept Audio In from a DAW

2008-04-13 by David Bulog

Although I have a Korg-MS20 Im looking for a similar module to MS-20  
Audio in that will accept Audio in from a DAW output
So far on my shortlist are
Doepfer A-119
Cwejman ap1
Cwejman AI-2

Can anyone give me the pro and cons of the A-119 compared to Cwejman


thanks David

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Creating a Virtual Oberheim 2 or 4-Voice

2008-04-13 by Mark Pulver

As a thought, you might also wanna pop in on the Analogue Heaven list and 
ask this question. That can increase your chances of finding someone with a 
2 -4 -8 voice, or even the single SEM you're looking for. Subscription info 
is here:

   http://machines.hyperreal.org/Analogue-Heaven/

One thing to keep in mind as you build up a Doepfer based SEM multi- is 
that one thing behind the power that comes from a real 8 voice is that each 
voice is NOT exactly the same as the others. Even the slightest extra tweak 
of resonance, cutoff, attack time, etc., coupled with panning the multiple 
voices across the stereo spread (but never HARD left or right!) adds to 
that lush power... Much like Phil Spector's "Wall Of Sound" technique.

Good Luck!

Mark
------
J. Talbert (09:45 AM 4/13/2008) wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
 >Hi, folks!
 >
 >I haven't posted here much since I came here for advice on purchasing
 >my first A100 modules.  But I can happily say that my A100 has grown
 >quite a since those first 12 modules you guys helped me pick!  So
 >here's what I'm hoping someone here can help me with now...
 >
 >Ever since Joe Zawinul appeared on the cover of Keyboard magazine
 >decades ago with his Oberheim 8-voice, I've had an intense desire to
 >own at least a 2 or 4-voice.  However, I'd rather not spend the kind
 >of money these things are going for these days (especially given
 >their age).  So my crazy quest is to try and patch something that can
 >sound reasonably similar on an A100 and *maybe* even a Nord Modular
 >G2 or G1 (yeah I know they're not analog, but it's really just for
 >fun in that case).  Unfortunately, I can't find the sound of a raw
 >SEM.  I believe I've already got the necessary A100 modules and of
 >course the Nord Modulars have an endless number of modules to build
 >from.  What I'm hoping someone can provide are short WAV recordings
 >of:
 >
 >- Note (single voice) with saw, square and pulse waveforms
 >- Note with a slowly opening and then closing filter (no resonance)
 >- Note with a slowly opening and then closing filter (mid resonance)
 >- Note with a slowly opening and then closing filter (full resonance)
 >- Filter only (self resonating)
 >
 >I would also like a brief description of how voice allocation works
 >on a 2, 4 or 8 voice in terms of how SEM banks are assigned. And of
 >course, if there are other quirks that this instrument has which
 >contribute to it's sound that I might need to know about, please
 >include that information as well (like envelope behavior, sequencer
 >strangeness, etc.)
 >
 >I hope this all isn't too much to ask, but I'd really like to have a
 >proper reference point before I embark down this path.  Of course,
 >even if what I'm attempting is absolutely not possible to come close
 >to, I can appreciate that feedback as well - just know then that you
 >may be sending me into great debt as I try to get hold of a real
 >Oberheim 4-voice!  :-)
 >
 >Also, if someone here can make the recordings but need a place to
 >host them, I can set up an FTP location.  If the files can be
 >compressed with WinRAR, that should greatly reduce the file size.
 >
 >Thanks!
 >
 >Kindest regards,
 >John

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Creating a Virtual Oberheim 2 or 4-Voice

2008-04-13 by John Talbert

Hi, Mark!  Thanks for the recommendation.  I'd forgotten about the AH list.

I realize I'll need essentially one mono synth worth of modules for
each voice (vco, envelope, filter, vca, panner).  Right now I have
enough of those as well as a MCV24 to manage the polyphony.  Although
I only have one SEM module at the moment, I'll get more if this
experiment works.  I just want to find out if I can really get the
sound of an Oberheim 4-voice, and if so, I can finally stop
entertaining thoughts of spending $5000+ for a second-hand one on
eBay.   I'm just too worried that spending that kind of cash on
something that old is just too big of a risk.

Kindest regards,
John
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Mark Pulver <mark@midiwall.com> wrote:
>
>
> As a thought, you might also wanna pop in on the Analogue Heaven list and
> ask this question. That can increase your chances of finding someone with a
> 2 -4 -8 voice, or even the single SEM you're looking for. Subscription info
> is here:
>
> http://machines.hyperreal.org/Analogue-Heaven/
>
> One thing to keep in mind as you build up a Doepfer based SEM multi- is
> that one thing behind the power that comes from a real 8 voice is that each
> voice is NOT exactly the same as the others. Even the slightest extra tweak
> of resonance, cutoff, attack time, etc., coupled with panning the multiple
> voices across the stereo spread (but never HARD left or right!) adds to
> that lush power... Much like Phil Spector's "Wall Of Sound" technique.
>
> Good Luck!
>
> Mark
> ------
>
>
> J. Talbert (09:45 AM 4/13/2008) wrote:
> >Hi, folks!
> >
> >I haven't posted here much since I came here for advice on purchasing
> >my first A100 modules. But I can happily say that my A100 has grown
> >quite a since those first 12 modules you guys helped me pick! So
> >here's what I'm hoping someone here can help me with now...
> >
> >Ever since Joe Zawinul appeared on the cover of Keyboard magazine
> >decades ago with his Oberheim 8-voice, I've had an intense desire to
> >own at least a 2 or 4-voice. However, I'd rather not spend the kind
> >of money these things are going for these days (especially given
> >their age). So my crazy quest is to try and patch something that can
> >sound reasonably similar on an A100 and *maybe* even a Nord Modular
> >G2 or G1 (yeah I know they're not analog, but it's really just for
> >fun in that case). Unfortunately, I can't find the sound of a raw
> >SEM. I believe I've already got the necessary A100 modules and of
> >course the Nord Modulars have an endless number of modules to build
> >from. What I'm hoping someone can provide are short WAV recordings
> >of:
> >
> >- Note (single voice) with saw, square and pulse waveforms
> >- Note with a slowly opening and then closing filter (no resonance)
> >- Note with a slowly opening and then closing filter (mid resonance)
> >- Note with a slowly opening and then closing filter (full resonance)
> >- Filter only (self resonating)
> >
> >I would also like a brief description of how voice allocation works
> >on a 2, 4 or 8 voice in terms of how SEM banks are assigned. And of
> >course, if there are other quirks that this instrument has which
> >contribute to it's sound that I might need to know about, please
> >include that information as well (like envelope behavior, sequencer
> >strangeness, etc.)
> >
> >I hope this all isn't too much to ask, but I'd really like to have a
> >proper reference point before I embark down this path. Of course,
> >even if what I'm attempting is absolutely not possible to come close
> >to, I can appreciate that feedback as well - just know then that you
> >may be sending me into great debt as I try to get hold of a real
> >Oberheim 4-voice! :-)
> >
> >Also, if someone here can make the recordings but need a place to
> >host them, I can set up an FTP location. If the files can be
> >compressed with WinRAR, that should greatly reduce the file size.
> >
> >Thanks!
> >
> >Kindest regards,
> >John
>

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Creating a Virtual Oberheim 2 or 4-Voice

2008-04-15 by James Husted

As a past owner of a 4-voice, a 2-voice, various SEM modules and once  
hosting a website of Oberheim Schematics (an EM magazine pick-of-the- 
month) I am very familiar with the sound of the SEM. It has been some  
time since I owned a Oberheim (i still have all the schematics  
though!) so this is from very strong memories. I think there is  
nothing quite comparable to a 4-voice played in unison mode - a very  
huge sound. I can't say the component parts of a SEM are very  
remarkable. A SEM can be easily made with most modulars today.  
Especially the basic low-pass filter sound commonly used. The filter  
was a standard 12db/oct multimode with a knob to mix through the  
modes - a standard multi-mode with a mixer module will give you more  
options than the SEM did.  The VCOs were Saw and Pulse - you can get  
more waveforms and mix them too. The Envelope generators were simple  
ones Attack Decay Sustain also easy to get. They were pretty snappy  
if needed. The main "sound" that the 4-voice had, the sound I think  
you seek, was the product of having 8 VCOs playing at once and not  
being exactly in tune. it is like the difference between one violin  
and 8 - a big difference. Most polyphonic synthesizers today have  
VCOs that are derived from one clock source and the add variation or  
purposely de-tune slightly to get a fatter sound. With a modular,  
each VCO will be out of tune also but the pitch relationship between  
VCOs will change over the playing range (because of tracking errors)  
and also over time (because of thermal reasons). The keyboard had a  
couple of modes. The common lowest note priority - highest note  
priority and the awesome unison mode (split-able between keyboard  
halves) but the most unique mode was the scanning one. With each  
keypress a different SEM was played. This meant with a 3-note chord  
played a very cool choral sound happened - it was fairly hard to get  
the SEMs to sound exactly alike.
I think you can get very close to the Obie sound with a modular. I  
think you can surpass it even. It will cost you some cash and a tone  
of space. Ask Bakis - he has a few SEMs and enough Doepfer to make a  
good 4-voice emulation I'm sure (it sure looks like it in his  
pictures!). I think the key is - buy tons of modules!

-James
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Apr 13, 2008, at 3:44 PM, John Talbert wrote:
> Hi, Mark!  Thanks for the recommendation.  I'd forgotten about the  
> AH list.
>
> I realize I'll need essentially one mono synth worth of modules for
> each voice (vco, envelope, filter, vca, panner).  Right now I have
> enough of those as well as a MCV24 to manage the polyphony.  Although
> I only have one SEM module at the moment, I'll get more if this
> experiment works.  I just want to find out if I can really get the
> sound of an Oberheim 4-voice, and if so, I can finally stop
> entertaining thoughts of spending $5000+ for a second-hand one on
> eBay.   I'm just too worried that spending that kind of cash on
> something that old is just too big of a risk.
>
> Kindest regards,
> John
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Mark Pulver <mark@midiwall.com>  
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> As a thought, you might also wanna pop in on the Analogue Heaven  
>> list and
>> ask this question. That can increase your chances of finding  
>> someone with a
>> 2 -4 -8 voice, or even the single SEM you're looking for.  
>> Subscription info
>> is here:
>>
>> http://machines.hyperreal.org/Analogue-Heaven/
>>
>> One thing to keep in mind as you build up a Doepfer based SEM  
>> multi- is
>> that one thing behind the power that comes from a real 8 voice is  
>> that each
>> voice is NOT exactly the same as the others. Even the slightest  
>> extra tweak
>> of resonance, cutoff, attack time, etc., coupled with panning the  
>> multiple
>> voices across the stereo spread (but never HARD left or right!)  
>> adds to
>> that lush power... Much like Phil Spector's "Wall Of Sound"  
>> technique.
>>
>> Good Luck!
>>
>> Mark
>> ------
>>
>>
>> J. Talbert (09:45 AM 4/13/2008) wrote:
>>> Hi, folks!
>>>
>>> I haven't posted here much since I came here for advice on  
>>> purchasing
>>> my first A100 modules. But I can happily say that my A100 has grown
>>> quite a since those first 12 modules you guys helped me pick! So
>>> here's what I'm hoping someone here can help me with now...
>>>
>>> Ever since Joe Zawinul appeared on the cover of Keyboard magazine
>>> decades ago with his Oberheim 8-voice, I've had an intense desire to
>>> own at least a 2 or 4-voice. However, I'd rather not spend the kind
>>> of money these things are going for these days (especially given
>>> their age). So my crazy quest is to try and patch something that can
>>> sound reasonably similar on an A100 and *maybe* even a Nord Modular
>>> G2 or G1 (yeah I know they're not analog, but it's really just for
>>> fun in that case). Unfortunately, I can't find the sound of a raw
>>> SEM. I believe I've already got the necessary A100 modules and of
>>> course the Nord Modulars have an endless number of modules to build
>>> from. What I'm hoping someone can provide are short WAV recordings
>>> of:
>>>
>>> - Note (single voice) with saw, square and pulse waveforms
>>> - Note with a slowly opening and then closing filter (no resonance)
>>> - Note with a slowly opening and then closing filter (mid resonance)
>>> - Note with a slowly opening and then closing filter (full  
>>> resonance)
>>> - Filter only (self resonating)
>>>
>>> I would also like a brief description of how voice allocation works
>>> on a 2, 4 or 8 voice in terms of how SEM banks are assigned. And of
>>> course, if there are other quirks that this instrument has which
>>> contribute to it's sound that I might need to know about, please
>>> include that information as well (like envelope behavior, sequencer
>>> strangeness, etc.)
>>>
>>> I hope this all isn't too much to ask, but I'd really like to have a
>>> proper reference point before I embark down this path. Of course,
>>> even if what I'm attempting is absolutely not possible to come close
>>> to, I can appreciate that feedback as well - just know then that you
>>> may be sending me into great debt as I try to get hold of a real
>>> Oberheim 4-voice! :-)
>>>
>>> Also, if someone here can make the recordings but need a place to
>>> host them, I can set up an FTP location. If the files can be
>>> compressed with WinRAR, that should greatly reduce the file size.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Kindest regards,
>>> John
>>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Creating a Virtual Oberheim 2 or 4-Voice

2008-04-15 by Bakis Sirros

James is right.    :-)

buy 8 vco's and four SEM doepfer filters to start
with...
(although i do not have the SEM doepfer filter module
yet to comment on its sound...)

and 3 out of my 4 SEM's are in my tech's to be
converted to modular rack.

so, soon i'll have an Oberheim 4-voice modular synth
(20 U in total)

best regards,    :-)
Bakis.



--- James Husted <the_ersatz_planet@mac.com> wrote:

> As a past owner of a 4-voice, a 2-voice, various SEM
> modules and once  
> hosting a website of Oberheim Schematics (an EM
> magazine pick-of-the- 
> month) I am very familiar with the sound of the SEM.
> It has been some  
> time since I owned a Oberheim (i still have all the
> schematics  
> though!) so this is from very strong memories. I
> think there is  
> nothing quite comparable to a 4-voice played in
> unison mode - a very  
> huge sound. I can't say the component parts of a SEM
> are very  
> remarkable. A SEM can be easily made with most
> modulars today.  
> Especially the basic low-pass filter sound commonly
> used. The filter  
> was a standard 12db/oct multimode with a knob to mix
> through the  
> modes - a standard multi-mode with a mixer module
> will give you more  
> options than the SEM did.  The VCOs were Saw and
> Pulse - you can get  
> more waveforms and mix them too. The Envelope
> generators were simple  
> ones Attack Decay Sustain also easy to get. They
> were pretty snappy  
> if needed. The main "sound" that the 4-voice had,
> the sound I think  
> you seek, was the product of having 8 VCOs playing
> at once and not  
> being exactly in tune. it is like the difference
> between one violin  
> and 8 - a big difference. Most polyphonic
> synthesizers today have  
> VCOs that are derived from one clock source and the
> add variation or  
> purposely de-tune slightly to get a fatter sound.
> With a modular,  
> each VCO will be out of tune also but the pitch
> relationship between  
> VCOs will change over the playing range (because of
> tracking errors)  
> and also over time (because of thermal reasons). The
> keyboard had a  
> couple of modes. The common lowest note priority -
> highest note  
> priority and the awesome unison mode (split-able
> between keyboard  
> halves) but the most unique mode was the scanning
> one. With each  
> keypress a different SEM was played. This meant with
> a 3-note chord  
> played a very cool choral sound happened - it was
> fairly hard to get  
> the SEMs to sound exactly alike.
> I think you can get very close to the Obie sound
> with a modular. I  
> think you can surpass it even. It will cost you some
> cash and a tone  
> of space. Ask Bakis - he has a few SEMs and enough
> Doepfer to make a  
> good 4-voice emulation I'm sure (it sure looks like
> it in his  
> pictures!). I think the key is - buy tons of
> modules!
> 
> -James
> 
> On Apr 13, 2008, at 3:44 PM, John Talbert wrote:
> > Hi, Mark!  Thanks for the recommendation.  I'd
> forgotten about the  
> > AH list.
> >
> > I realize I'll need essentially one mono synth
> worth of modules for
> > each voice (vco, envelope, filter, vca, panner). 
> Right now I have
> > enough of those as well as a MCV24 to manage the
> polyphony.  Although
> > I only have one SEM module at the moment, I'll get
> more if this
> > experiment works.  I just want to find out if I
> can really get the
> > sound of an Oberheim 4-voice, and if so, I can
> finally stop
> > entertaining thoughts of spending $5000+ for a
> second-hand one on
> > eBay.   I'm just too worried that spending that
> kind of cash on
> > something that old is just too big of a risk.
> >
> > Kindest regards,
> > John
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Mark Pulver
> <mark@midiwall.com>  
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> As a thought, you might also wanna pop in on the
> Analogue Heaven  
> >> list and
> >> ask this question. That can increase your chances
> of finding  
> >> someone with a
> >> 2 -4 -8 voice, or even the single SEM you're
> looking for.  
> >> Subscription info
> >> is here:
> >>
> >> http://machines.hyperreal.org/Analogue-Heaven/
> >>
> >> One thing to keep in mind as you build up a
> Doepfer based SEM  
> >> multi- is
> >> that one thing behind the power that comes from a
> real 8 voice is  
> >> that each
> >> voice is NOT exactly the same as the others. Even
> the slightest  
> >> extra tweak
> >> of resonance, cutoff, attack time, etc., coupled
> with panning the  
> >> multiple
> >> voices across the stereo spread (but never HARD
> left or right!)  
> >> adds to
> >> that lush power... Much like Phil Spector's "Wall
> Of Sound"  
> >> technique.
> >>
> >> Good Luck!
> >>
> >> Mark
> >> ------
> >>
> >>
> >> J. Talbert (09:45 AM 4/13/2008) wrote:
> >>> Hi, folks!
> >>>
> >>> I haven't posted here much since I came here for
> advice on  
> >>> purchasing
> >>> my first A100 modules. But I can happily say
> that my A100 has grown
> >>> quite a since those first 12 modules you guys
> helped me pick! So
> >>> here's what I'm hoping someone here can help me
> with now...
> >>>
> >>> Ever since Joe Zawinul appeared on the cover of
> Keyboard magazine
> >>> decades ago with his Oberheim 8-voice, I've had
> an intense desire to
> >>> own at least a 2 or 4-voice. However, I'd rather
> not spend the kind
> >>> of money these things are going for these days
> (especially given
> >>> their age). So my crazy quest is to try and
> patch something that can
> >>> sound reasonably similar on an A100 and *maybe*
> even a Nord Modular
> >>> G2 or G1 (yeah I know they're not analog, but
> it's really just for
> >>> fun in that case). Unfortunately, I can't find
> the sound of a raw
> >>> SEM. I believe I've already got the necessary
> A100 modules and of
> >>> course the Nord Modulars have an endless number
> of modules to build
> >>> from. What I'm hoping someone can provide are
> short WAV recordings
> >>> of:
> >>>
> >>> - Note (single voice) with saw, square and pulse
> waveforms
> >>> - Note with a slowly opening and then closing
> filter (no resonance)
> >>> - Note with a slowly opening and then closing
> filter (mid resonance)
> >>> - Note with a slowly opening and then closing
> filter (full  
> >>> resonance)
> >>> - Filter only (self resonating)
> >>>
> >>> I would also like a brief description of how
> voice allocation works
> >>> on a 2, 4 or 8 voice in terms of how SEM banks
> are assigned. And of
> >>> course, if there are other quirks that this
> instrument has which
> >>> contribute to it's sound that I might need to
> know about, please
> >>> include that information as well (like envelope
> behavior, sequencer
> >>> strangeness, etc.)
> >>>
> >>> I hope this all isn't too much to ask, but I'd
> really 
=== message truncated ===


Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
[Doepfer_a100] group owner
http://www.parallel-worlds-music.com
http://www.myspace.com/parallelworldsmusic
http://www.myspace.com/interconnectedmusic
http://www.myspace.com/memorygeist
http://www.DiN.org.uk
http://www.musicamaximamagnetica.com
http://www.shimarecords.co.uk
http://www.rubberrecords.gr
Athens-Greece


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

Pitch tracker?

2008-04-15 by Richard Scott

Can anyone recommend a pvery fast and pretty smooth euro rack modular pitch tracking module? mostly for use with saxophone... I guess it would need to have a pretty musical envelop generator onboard...

and in need to do a much better job than my old Korg ms20 - which is the last synth I tried to do this on - aweful!

Richard

-- 
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 446 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Best module to accept Audio In from a DAW

2008-04-17 by David Bulog

> Although I have a Korg-MS20 Im looking for a similar module to  
> MS-20 Audio in that will accept Audio in from a DAW output
> So far on my shortlist are
> Doepfer A-119
> Cwejman ap1
> Cwejman AI-2
>
> Can anyone give me the pro and cons of the A-119 compared to Cwejman
>
>
> thanks David



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Pitch tracker?

2008-04-20 by astroschnautzer

analogue systems has the rs35 but rumours say it aint better then the korg ms20 pitch-cv in 
terms of stability. Rumours also say korg ms20 pitch-cv is one of the best around... But 
havent tried the rs35 myself...

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.