Re: other possible modules vs. nintendo controller
2002-05-31 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 5/30/2002 2:10:09 AM Eastern Daylight Time, code_pig@yahoo.com writes: > Personally, and without trying to detract in any way from those that > may disagree with me, I think these modules would be far more useful > to a synthesist than a Nintendo controller. > hello ! just to play "devils advocate" - a compatible vu module is available from both analog systems and analog solutions. a frequency counter is an easy 3rd party buy, granted not in module format but possibly more useful as a standalone anyway and could doepfer produce on that would be price competitive ? the passive attenuating mults sound handy, though. nice for those patches where you don`t want to use up a mixer module. the main virtue i ascribe to the nintendo controller is as an interface that lets you act as a "conductor" for autonomous patches. i sincerely believe that it would allow one to use a different "vocabulary" of gestures to interact with our synths. this may be a small market segment but represents a fertile ground for development. in another vein, a "company produced" module that is sorely lacking is a simple switch module providing +5 gates, momentary contact or latching. again, all of the above is IMHO and certainly open to discussion ! best, dave [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]