Doepfer

having read dieter's warning on the a188-2 bbd page, i was wondering
if anyone using one would like to share their thoughts on the module
vis a vis its noisiness?

i use the a188-1 (4096 stages) very extensively, and find that using a
filter still leaves me enough highs for standard echo use, and for
madder things the clock adds its own grittiness.

but maybe the version 2 is significantly noisier?

cheers,

stu

hi List,
 
i have and use the a188-2 and i have not noticed any special noise problem with it, i mean more noise than the a188-1 or something...
 
sounds great, btw!

Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
[Doepfer_a100] group owner
www. parallel - worlds - music. com
www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
www. DiN. org. uk
www. musicamaximamagnetica. com
www. shimarecords. co. uk
www. rubberrecords. gr
Athens - Greece

--- On Sun, 10/19/08, Stu Grimshaw <grimshaw@stugrimshaw.com> wrote:

From: Stu Grimshaw <grimshaw@stugrimshaw.com>
Subject: [Doepfer_a100] a188-2: how noisy?
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, October 19, 2008, 9:55 PM






having read dieter's warning on the a188-2 bbd page, i was wondering
if anyone using one would like to share their thoughts on the module
vis a vis its noisiness?

i use the a188-1 (4096 stages) very extensively, and find that using a
filter still leaves me enough highs for standard echo use, and for
madder things the clock adds its own grittiness.

but maybe the version 2 is significantly noisier?

cheers,

stu

 













__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]