Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Thread

Fwd: AW: RE: [Doepfer_a100] info from doepfer!about the ribboncontrollerandsensor ke...

Fwd: AW: RE: [Doepfer_a100] info from doepfer!about the ribboncontrollerandsensor ke...

2002-07-25 by bakis Sirros

--- Dieter Doepfer <hardware@doepfer.de> wrote:
> From: "Dieter Doepfer" <hardware@doepfer.de>
> To: "bakis Sirros" <synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com>
> Subject: AW: RE: [Doepfer_a100] info from
> doepfer!about the ribboncontrollerandsensor ke...
> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 13:17:42 +0200
> 
> Dear Bakis,
> 
> thanks for the copy of the message below. Normally I
> observe about 90% of the
> messages of the group when I'm in the company (i.e.
> when I'm not in holidays or
> vistiting fairs or similar).
> 
> Some group members complain that I do not join the
> group and take part in the
> discussions. This has different reasons:
> 
> 1. I understand the forum as a customer group
> completely independent of Doepfer.
> I'm not sure if this remains the same when I appear
> as a member in the group
> (especially for new members).
> 2. I do not want to take a stand to the products of
> competitors (many items
> concern competitors too). I think it is bad style to
> criticize competitors.
> 3. Last but not least I do not have sufficient time
> to give my view to all
> messages. Most of the messages would require this
> from me as a part of the
> group.
> 
> 
> Sometimes I feel sorry not to be a member -
> especially when technically wrong
> statements are given by a member (not only
> concerning Doepfer products but even
> general wrong basic information).
> 
> But everybody is open to contact me directly and I
> think so far I replied each
> email - even if it may take some time as I'm very
> busy (remember my sideline: I
> have to manage a company).
> 
> Concerning the module suggestions there is a general
> problem: It takes at least
> 3 months to develop a new module or another device
> (basic considerations, pcb
> layout, prototype building and testing, software
> design for some products, front
> panel or case/housing design, redesigns if there
> occur problems, writing
> preliminary and final infos, taking pictures,
> writing user manuals and service
> manuals and many more). For more complex products
> like the touch sensor keyboard
> the required time is much longer. Of course for very
> simple designs (e.g. CV
> source A-176 or voltage inverter A-175 or mixer
> A-138) the development time was
> much less.
> This means that we are able to publish not more than
> about 4 modules/devices per
> year. And for these ~4 devices we have to pay
> attention not to generate a "flop"
> as we have to pay the salaries for our employees
> every month. We made the
> experience that the sales are much less for more
> "exotic" and more expensive
> modules or devices (e.g. we sell much less
> Theremins/Shepards/Vocoders/Subharmonics that
> VCFs/ADSRs/LFOs/VCOs).
> 
> But I think that the group's suggestions for the
> proceeding for new exotic
> modules (like Nintendo or space mouse controllers)
> is a good starting point. We
> could try to collect advance orders and then
> calculate the price based on the
> number of advance orders. As soon as the price is
> defined the customers may
> decide if they accept the price. When too many
> orderers jump off the price will
> have to be re-calculated because of the new
> conditions. It is a bit complicated
> but it may work. I think we will try this for the
> Nintendo and space mouse
> module. For the space mouse module I would advise
> against as the transmission
> rate from the space mouse is too small from our
> point of view. But it seems that
> some customers would accept this. Another question
> is if we should manufacture a
> product we do no stand by (as for the space mouse
> controller). I'm not sure if
> we should offer a product with drawbacks known in
> advance even if some customers
> ask for this product.
> 
> And one last statement: When we know that there is a
> module already available
> from one of our competitors we (normally) do not
> develop a similar product. Of
> course there are exceptions: If a competitor
> publishes a module after we
> finished a similar product we normally will offer
> our module too as we already
> invested the development costs. But generally we
> think that the small community
> of analog modular systems manufacturer should not
> make their live harder as it
> is already. We have good relationship with some
> other manufacturers (e.g. Bob
> Williams of Analogue Systems, or the common Super
> Booth at the Frankfurt show
> together with Technosaurus, Analogue Solutions,
> Vermona, Sherman, Moog and
> others). As an example we will not develop a new
> high end VCO as there are some
> solutions already available from our competitors (or
> even friends).
> 
> You may publish this statement in the forum if
> desired.
> 
> Best wishes
> Dieter Doepfer
> Doepfer Musikelektronik GmbH
> http://www.doepfer.de
> email: hardware@doepfer.de
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: bakis Sirros
> [mailto:synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com]
> > Gesendet am: Dienstag, 23. Juli 2002 14:13
> > An: dieter doepfer
> > Betreff: Fwd: RE: [Doepfer_a100] info from
> doepfer!about the
> > ribboncontrollerandsensor ke...
> >
> >
> > --- David Salter <david.salter@reuters.com> wrote:
> > > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > > From: David Salter <david.salter@reuters.com>
> > > Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 12:13:56 +0100
> > > Subject: RE: [Doepfer_a100] info from
> doepfer!about
> > > the
> > >  ribboncontrollerandsensor ke...
> > >
> > > Hi Dave,
> > >
> > > I hope it does make it to production.
> > >
> > > Very exciting idea.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure what Doepfers take on releasing
> > > intellectual property is but this thing would be
> of
> > > interest to modular users regardless of the
> origin
> > > of the modules.
> > >
> > > Maybe Bakis (are you there Bakis?) could could
> have
> > > a quite word with Dieter - I like the idea of a
> > > limited edition or small production run for
> those of
> > > us who either don't play keys or are more
> > > experimentally orientated (I fall into both
> > > categories).
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > David Salter
> > > Reuters Consulting
> > > Tel: +44 20 7542 2402
> > > Mob: +44 7990562402
> > > Fax: +44 20 7542 2699
> > >
> > > 	-----Original Message-----
> > > 	From: davevosh@aol.com
> [mailto:davevosh@aol.com]
> > > 	Sent: 23 July 2002 11:53
> > > 	To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > > 	Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] info from
> doepfer!about
> > > the ribboncontrollerandsensor ke...
> > >
> > >
> > > 	In a message dated 7/23/2002 6:01:28 AM Eastern
> > > Daylight Time,
> > > 	david.salter@reuters.com writes:
> > >
> > >
> > > 	>
> > > 	> The n-64 controller is a superb idea. I love
> that
> > > fact the not only do you
> > > 	> get a couple of continuous controllers but
> the
> > > ability to trigger events,
> > > 	> envelopes, sequencers or resetting lfo's, all
> > > from one controller. Amazing.
> > > 	> I hope it does get into production, even if
> it's
> > > done as a limited edition
> > > 	> or short run.
> > > 	>
> > > 	>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 	hello david,
> > > 	i agree ( and have lobbied for it, so far
> without
> > > being able to whip up much
> > > 	enthusiasm from most folks  :^(  ) - i think
> this
> > > device would offer
> > > 	tremendous flexibility in being able to conduct
> /
> > > interact with patches. one
> > > 	of the neatest ideas i`ve seen in a while but
> looks
> > > like it may not come to
> > > 	fruition.
> > > 	if  its absolutely dead as a product, perhaps
> > > doepfer would consider
> > > 	releasing the schematics to the  d.i.y.
> community -
> > > ?
> > > 	best,
> > > 	dave
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 	[Non-text portions of this message have been
> > > removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > >
> > >
> >
>
<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=228862.2128520.3581629.1829184/D=egroupweb/S=17
>
05032144:HM/A=1155070/R=0/*http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/990-1736-1039-302>
> >
> >
> > 	To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > 	doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > 	Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
> Yahoo!
> > Terms of Service
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
> > .
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
-------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---
> >         Visit our Internet site at
> > http://www.reuters.com
> >
> > Any views expressed in this message are those of
> > the  individual
> > sender,  except  where  the sender specifically
> > states them to be
> > the views of Reuters Ltd.
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been
> > removed]
> >
> >
> 
> 
> =====
> synthfreak(parallel worlds)
> athens-greece
> [Doepfer_a100] group owner-moderator
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
> 


=====
synthfreak(parallel worlds)
athens-greece
[Doepfer_a100] group owner-moderator

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com

Re: Fwd: AW: RE: [Doepfer_a100] info from doepfer!about the ribboncontrollerandsensor ke...

2002-07-26 by code_pig

A most civilized response to the mob.  Now about that Frequency 
Shifter modification...  Okay, I'll shut up.

Regards,
Kevin

--- In Doepfer_a100@y..., bakis Sirros <synth_freak_2000@y...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> --- Dieter Doepfer <hardware@d...> wrote:
> > From: "Dieter Doepfer" <hardware@d...>
> > To: "bakis Sirros" <synth_freak_2000@y...>
> > Subject: AW: RE: [Doepfer_a100] info from
> > doepfer!about the ribboncontrollerandsensor ke...
> > Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 13:17:42 +0200
> > 
> > Dear Bakis,
> > 
> > thanks for the copy of the message below. Normally I
> > observe about 90% of the
> > messages of the group when I'm in the company (i.e.
> > when I'm not in holidays or
> > vistiting fairs or similar).
> > 
> > Some group members complain that I do not join the
> > group and take part in the
> > discussions. This has different reasons:
> > 
> > 1. I understand the forum as a customer group
> > completely independent of Doepfer.
> > I'm not sure if this remains the same when I appear
> > as a member in the group
> > (especially for new members).
> > 2. I do not want to take a stand to the products of
> > competitors (many items
> > concern competitors too). I think it is bad style to
> > criticize competitors.
> > 3. Last but not least I do not have sufficient time
> > to give my view to all
> > messages. Most of the messages would require this
> > from me as a part of the
> > group.
> > 
> > 
> > Sometimes I feel sorry not to be a member -
> > especially when technically wrong
> > statements are given by a member (not only
> > concerning Doepfer products but even
> > general wrong basic information).
> > 
> > But everybody is open to contact me directly and I
> > think so far I replied each
> > email - even if it may take some time as I'm very
> > busy (remember my sideline: I
> > have to manage a company).
> > 
> > Concerning the module suggestions there is a general
> > problem: It takes at least
> > 3 months to develop a new module or another device
> > (basic considerations, pcb
> > layout, prototype building and testing, software
> > design for some products, front
> > panel or case/housing design, redesigns if there
> > occur problems, writing
> > preliminary and final infos, taking pictures,
> > writing user manuals and service
> > manuals and many more). For more complex products
> > like the touch sensor keyboard
> > the required time is much longer. Of course for very
> > simple designs (e.g. CV
> > source A-176 or voltage inverter A-175 or mixer
> > A-138) the development time was
> > much less.
> > This means that we are able to publish not more than
> > about 4 modules/devices per
> > year. And for these ~4 devices we have to pay
> > attention not to generate a "flop"
> > as we have to pay the salaries for our employees
> > every month. We made the
> > experience that the sales are much less for more
> > "exotic" and more expensive
> > modules or devices (e.g. we sell much less
> > Theremins/Shepards/Vocoders/Subharmonics that
> > VCFs/ADSRs/LFOs/VCOs).
> > 
> > But I think that the group's suggestions for the
> > proceeding for new exotic
> > modules (like Nintendo or space mouse controllers)
> > is a good starting point. We
> > could try to collect advance orders and then
> > calculate the price based on the
> > number of advance orders. As soon as the price is
> > defined the customers may
> > decide if they accept the price. When too many
> > orderers jump off the price will
> > have to be re-calculated because of the new
> > conditions. It is a bit complicated
> > but it may work. I think we will try this for the
> > Nintendo and space mouse
> > module. For the space mouse module I would advise
> > against as the transmission
> > rate from the space mouse is too small from our
> > point of view. But it seems that
> > some customers would accept this. Another question
> > is if we should manufacture a
> > product we do no stand by (as for the space mouse
> > controller). I'm not sure if
> > we should offer a product with drawbacks known in
> > advance even if some customers
> > ask for this product.
> > 
> > And one last statement: When we know that there is a
> > module already available
> > from one of our competitors we (normally) do not
> > develop a similar product. Of
> > course there are exceptions: If a competitor
> > publishes a module after we
> > finished a similar product we normally will offer
> > our module too as we already
> > invested the development costs. But generally we
> > think that the small community
> > of analog modular systems manufacturer should not
> > make their live harder as it
> > is already. We have good relationship with some
> > other manufacturers (e.g. Bob
> > Williams of Analogue Systems, or the common Super
> > Booth at the Frankfurt show
> > together with Technosaurus, Analogue Solutions,
> > Vermona, Sherman, Moog and
> > others). As an example we will not develop a new
> > high end VCO as there are some
> > solutions already available from our competitors (or
> > even friends).
> > 
> > You may publish this statement in the forum if
> > desired.
> > 
> > Best wishes
> > Dieter Doepfer
> > Doepfer Musikelektronik GmbH
> > http://www.doepfer.de
> > email: hardware@d...

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.