Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Thread

Re: Module requests: Simple 48 db filter and simple Hipass

Re: Module requests: Simple 48 db filter and simple Hipass

2010-12-17 by selfoscillate

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, zaum <zaum@...> wrote:
>
> If one is looking to improve performance on the BBD modules I'd think  
> besides a steep filter, wouldn't one also want a compander (compressor  
> & expander) to improve signal to noise


yes, indeed that helps to improve the signal/noise ratio.
anyway you have to filter out the clock noise before
comressing the signal, otherwise the clock noise is
compressed too and gets even more audible.

Re: Module requests: Simple 48 db filter and simple Hipass

2010-12-17 by selfoscillate

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "selfoscillate" <synaptic_music@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, zaum <zaum@> wrote:
> >
> > If one is looking to improve performance on the BBD modules I'd think  
> > besides a steep filter, wouldn't one also want a compander (compressor  
> > & expander) to improve signal to noise
> 
> 
> yes, indeed that helps to improve the signal/noise ratio.
> anyway you have to filter out the clock noise before
> comressing the signal, otherwise the clock noise is
> compressed too and gets even more audible.

i mean, of course, when compressing the bbd output.
compressing the input is good in any case and doesn't
affect the clock noise.

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.