Doepfer

hi ringmod,
please fell free to do another poll.
bakis.


--- ringmod45 <ringmod45@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi List,
> 
> thanks to everyone who voted in the poll for the
> forthcoming new A107 
> CEM 3372 filter based on the Erwik/Matrix 12 model.
> this should give 
> a basic idea to Doepfer of what list members had to
> say on the 
> subject.
> 
> 19 people voted in the poll. multiple questions were
> asked in the 
> A107 poll. in order to get the proper %'s for each
> of the questions. 
> i divided the answers by the total of number persons
> who voted in the 
> poll.
> 
> #1)  would you like to have all 15 filter types of
> the original 
> Matrix 12 plus the New Ones being developed by
> Doepfer?
> 
> 18 votes, 15.25%     18/19 = 94%
> 
> #2)  would you like the ability to morph smoothly
> through all the 
> filter types?,
> 
> 18 votes, 15.25%     18/19 = 94%
> 
> #3)would you like to have the Hard switching option
> on the final 
> output VCA?,
> 
> 12 votes, 10.17%     12/19 = 63%
> 
> #4)  would you like to have one or more memories to
> sequence the 
> filter types for the Voltage Control Filter
> Selection input?         
> 
> 9 votes, 7.63%       9/19 = 47%
> 
> #5)  would you like to have the filter Self
> Oscillate?(if possible) 
> 
> 12 votes,10.17%      12/19 = 63%
> 
> #6)  would you like to have Voltage Control of the
> Resonance?
> 
> 18 votes, 15.25%     18/19 = 94%
> 
> #7)  would you like to have an extra Voltage Control
> Input with an 
> Attenuator?(i.e. one fixed input and two inputs with
> Attenuators like 
> the A120)
> 
> 17 votes, 14.41%     17/19 = 90%
> 
> #8)  would you like to have input and an attenuator
> to control the 
> time base the Voltage Control Filter Type Selection
> memory sequence ? 
> ( please refer to the post with" A107 Time Base
> Input" in the subject 
> header)
> 
>  14 votes, 11.86%    14/19 = 74%
> 
> 
> so there you have it. 9 persons voted for question
> #4 and 14 persons 
> voted for question #8. question #8 is directly
> related to question 
> #4, so the results of #4 should be closer to #8 for
> question #8 to 
> have any validity. i don't believe this would be as
> costly to 
> implement as the morphing feature. it would be a
> great function for 
> sonic mangling and sound design.
> 
> the next question we need to ask ourselves is, How
> much do we want to 
> pay for this morphing function? 18 of 19 people or
> 94% of you voted 
> to have this feature. so judging by what Mr.Doepfer
> wrote about the 
> price options described in Digest # 2457  and the
> suggestion from 
> Bakis to do a poll concerning the pricing structure
> of the A107, it 
> is obvious some of these results might be useful if
> price does become.
> 
> i think there should be two versions of the A107.
> one with all the 
> features that were voted in this poll and the other
> with less 
> features to match the more simple layouts of the
> A120, A122, A123, 
> A124.etc. having just a simple function set and
> layout for this 
> filter would be a shame due to the sonic
> possibilities laying there 
> with the features that were voted for in the poll.
> 
>  oh well, i guess it really boils down to people's
> pocket books. for 
> me, the more creative possibilities and esoteric
> functions on a 
> module determines my decision to buy it and not the
> price.
> 
> so Bakis, would you like me to do another to
> solidify the price to 
> function ratio?
> 
> regards,
> RM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


=====
synthfreak(parallel worlds)
athens-greece
[Doepfer_a100] group owner-moderator

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/