> On 24 Sep 2014, at 14:33, Nicholas Keller maq163x2@gmail.com [Doepfer_a100] <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
> As per my last reply where I suggest monitoring the 3 outputs of you original patch..... If you have a DMM with DCV setting, you could advance each step manually and measure the outputs to verify that all three are in fact different and that the combined quantizer output is different from the plain S&H output.
>
> Nick
>
> Sent from the future
>
>> On Sep 24, 2014, at 9:02 AM, "David Kellett davidkellettwoulf@yahoo.com [Doepfer_a100]" <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> It is each note to be affected not each bar.
>>
>> David
>>
>> www.movingisliving.co.uk
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On 24 Sep 2014, at 14:01, Nicholas Keller maq163x2@gmail.com [Doepfer_a100] <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> I'm still not sure I understand what you want. Do you want each bar to be transposed by a random amount? Or do you want each individual step to be a random value within a certain range from the active SQ-10 step value (so that if S+H range = -/+3 semitones, and SQ-10 sequence = A,B,C,D, then quantizer output COULD equal A+2,B-3,C-1,D, A-2,B,C+2,D+1....)
>>>
>>> I'm also not sure I understand the other comment in this thread. Setting a VCA gain to 5 would mean that 4V from the SQ-10 would become 2V from the Quantizer. No?
>>>
>>> Nick
>>>
>>> Sent from the future
>>>
>>>> On Sep 24, 2014, at 5:23 AM, "David Kellett davidkellettwoulf@yahoo.com [Doepfer_a100]" <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My original sequence is supplied by a Korg SQ10 - the triggers not being compatible are coming from elsewhere.
>>>>
>>>> I want a basic shape to the sequence with a slight and varying remove from it.
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>> www.movingisliving.co.uk
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>>> On 23 Sep 2014, at 15:13, Nicholas Keller maq163x2@gmail.com [Doepfer_a100] <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello David.
>>>>>
>>>>> You are speaking my language.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's back up a bit. You said that the S+H is being triggered in time with the original sequence. In this case, the original sequence basically becomes unnecessary as for each step in the sequence, another voltage is added. You are correct that the result should never repeat (at least it is highly unlikely) but it is also hardly any relation to the original random-ordered note pattern. If you reduced the S+H clock to something more like 1 bar, then you would have more of a transposing effect applied to the original random sequence, but I assume this is not the effect you were after. What type of pattern exactly are you trying to generate? As it is now, your mixed quantized output wouldn't be noticeably different from a more simple 118->148->156 output (unless directly comparing the two in realtime, of course). What sequencer is creating the initial random pattern?
>>>>>
>>>>> Nick
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from the future
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sep 23, 2014, at 9:05 AM, "David Kellett davidkellettwoulf@yahoo.com [Doepfer_a100]" <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm trying to create a randomised sequence. I have an analog sequence of volta going into a quantiser via an A138 Lin. In another channel of the 138 I have a S&H voltage. The S&H is derived from an A148 clocked by the same trigger as the sequence and with the sample being Random control from an A118. I expected that the random S&H voltage would "push" the sequenced notes slightly - so the sequence would be related to the original but never the same. What I get is the sequence or the random - whatever settings I use in the mixer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So what have I got wrong / not understood?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David
>>>>>>
>>>>>> www.movingisliving.co.uk
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>
>
>