Re: A117 - lowest rate?
2014-10-30 by Richard Horsman
It goes as slow as you want. Just feed it a slow clock from an LFO Sent from my iPhone
Thread
Re: A117 - lowest rate?
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A117 - lowest rate?
2014-10-30 by David Kellett
My understanding was that you can use a clock but don't have to - and I don't want to as I want a random clock not clocked random :-) David www.movingisliving.co.uk Sent from my iPhone
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> On 30 Oct 2014, at 15:57, Richard Horsman richyho@virginmedia.com [Doepfer_a100] <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > > It goes as slow as you want. Just feed it a slow clock from an LFO > > Sent from my iPhone >
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A117 - lowest rate?
2014-10-30 by Florian Anwander
Am 30.10.2014 17:04, schrieb David Kellett davidkellettwoulf@yahoo.com > My understanding was that you can use a clock but don't have to - > and I don't want to as I want a random clock not clocked random :-) I did not try that, but what about using the random output to control a VC(LF)O, that controls the clock? Florian
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A117 - lowest rate?
2014-10-30 by achtung_999
It randomises the clock. I use it all the time like that.
So it produces a clock 'around' the clock that you input.
Nifty feature. A117 alone on slowest rate is a bit too fast for most clocking purposes.
So it produces a clock 'around' the clock that you input.
Nifty feature. A117 alone on slowest rate is a bit too fast for most clocking purposes.
Ernst
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Florian Anwander fanwander@mnet-online.de [Doepfer_a100] <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Am 30.10.2014 17:04, schrieb David Kellett davidkellettwoulf@yahoo.com >
My understanding was that you can use a clock but don't have to -
> and I don't want to as I want a random clock not clocked random :-)
I did not try that, but what about using the random output to control a
VC(LF)O, that controls the clock?
Florian
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A117 - lowest rate?
2014-10-30 by David Kellett
It would still depend how slow the rate is. If the rate can godown to approximately a pulse a couple of times a minute that would suit me. I don't own an a117 at the moment hence trying to get the information. David www.movingisliving.co.uk Sent from my iPhone
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> On 30 Oct 2014, at 16:22, Florian Anwander fanwander@mnet-online.de [Doepfer_a100] <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > > > > Am 30.10.2014 17:04, schrieb David Kellett davidkellettwoulf@yahoo.com > > My understanding was that you can use a clock but don't have to - > > and I don't want to as I want a random clock not clocked random :-) > > I did not try that, but what about using the random output to control a > VC(LF)O, that controls the clock? > > Florian >