Synth-DIY Yahoo! Groups Archives

A-170-2 slew.

2015-03-06 by yahoo

Hello, 

I’ve tested a make noise math and any waveform above 200/300Hz get transformed to something more “triangular” even with both slew parameters set to 0 (very obvious with a sine). 
I’ve got a A-170 and it’s definitely not the case: what goes in, come out unmodified if the slew is at 0. That’s what I like about it. 
So does the 170-2 have the same behaviour as the maths (modifying the incoming signal)? 
Is it the same type of circuitry that will lead to this behaviour? 

Thanks.

Re: [Doepfer_a100] A-170-2 slew.

2015-03-06 by yahoo

Sorry people. 
Total mail client fuck up. 

Just ignore.

Show quoted textHide quoted text

On 06 Mar 2015, at 14:51, yahoo ctujoao@yahoo.co.uk [Doepfer_a100] <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

> Hello, 
> 
> I’ve tested a make noise math and any waveform above 200/300Hz get transformed to something more “triangular” even with both slew parameters set to 0 (very obvious with a sine). 
> I’ve got a A-170 and it’s definitely not the case: what goes in, come out unmodified if the slew is at 0. That’s what I like about it. 
> So does the 170-2 have the same behaviour as the maths (modifying the incoming signal)? 
> Is it the same type of circuitry that will lead to this behaviour? 
> 
> Thanks. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Yahoo Groups Links
> 
> 
>