Re: [Doepfer_a100] Digest Number 418
2003-01-03 by mdimmm@hotmail.com
> From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > Reply-To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > Date: 19 Dec 2002 08:16:44 -0000 > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Digest Number 418 > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:35:39 -0000 > From: "kali_the_black <poictesme@earthlink.net>" <poictesme@earthlink.net> > Subject: Re: A-135 Voltage Controlled Mixer > > > I was ULTRA excited about the vc mixer and morphing controller when I > ordered my doepfer, but after having used it I'm not so excited about > it any more. I've been considering pulling out the a-144 and > replacing it with something more usefull like slew or another eg. > > the problem that I have with the morphing controller is that the > crossfades aren't really crossfades. And when you get them to sound > alright it's not that impressive anyway. Now if you were to use the Yeah, that's what I was a bit worried about too. I think it would take up too much space (in a portable system) for what it really does. I recommend the VC Panning Module for 2 channel crossfading, the internal inverter makes it very easy, just connect a joy stick or whatever directly. I have a regular mixer already, which is useful of course, but this would limit the added functionality of a VC Mixer.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> morphing controller to generate 4 voltages to control things like > filters that might be neat, but I haven't tried it yet (cause I just > thought of it, thanks for the chance to ramble on!). > > On the other hand I do use the mixer alot, just not the cv part of it > really. But all that being said, I do have a pretty nice pad set up > using just the modules that I'm bitching about! I guess it's just a > matter of them not being incredible, but usefull. > Ben > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "mdimmm@h..." <mdimmm@h...> > wrote: >> I'm considering adding an A-135 VC Mixer to my system. >> Has anyone used these in combination with the A-144 Morphing > Controller or >> by itself? >> Is it really worth the space it takes up, and what exactly does the > A-144 >> add?