Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Thread

RE: [Doepfer_a100] Re: NEW INFO FROM DOEPFER ABOUT NAMM 2003 AND MORE!!!

RE: [Doepfer_a100] Re: NEW INFO FROM DOEPFER ABOUT NAMM 2003 AND MORE!!!

2003-02-03 by David Salter

Yep, I agree Joe, 4 octs max plus the points I raised earlier
 
 

David Salter 
Reuters Consulting 
Tel: +44 20 7542 2402 
Mob: +44 7990562402 
Fax: +44 20 7542 2699 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
	-----Original Message-----
	From: Joe Buechler <buechlerjoe@toadmail.com>
[mailto:buechlerjoe@toadmail.com] 
	Sent: 03 February 2003 14:42
	To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
	Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: NEW INFO FROM DOEPFER ABOUT NAMM
2003 AND MORE!!!
	
	
	
	> Many people also aked
	> for a "normal" CV/Gate keyboard with 4 or 5 octaves
	> with the same features as the touch keyboard. 
	> ... In every case we will
	> also develop a "normal" CV/Gate keyboard as the
	> inquiries for such a keyboard are more than we
	> expected. 
	
	My checkbook has been open, waiting, since this suggestion first

	appeared here on the forum. If you build it, I'll buy it. 
	
	I think 3-4 octaves instead of 4-5 octaves would position it as
an 
	affordable alternative to the Voyager, for those who already
have an 
	analog synth engine, CV and/or midi.
	
	> Also a small version of the
	> Schaltwerk features (trigger sequencer with 16 steps/8
	> tracks with buttons and LEDs, but only one track is
	> visible at a time - this will keep the price low, the
	> desired track could be selected with additional
	> buttons or an encoder, several LED displays to show
	> the track/sequence and so on). 
	
	How ironic. This is what I *thought* I was buying in the
Regelwerk, 
	for precisely the reasons that Dieter describes. Unfortunately, 
	Doepfer seriously hobbled the Regelwerk by only including about
90% of 
	the Schaltwerk sequencer engine, leaving out some very key
features.
	
	If the small version of the Schaltwerk is produced, bravo, but
where 
	will that leave me? Stranded, that's where. I'm *very* fond of
those 
	faders :-)
	
	Maybe the Regelwerk could also be upgraded to include the
remainder of 
	the Schaltwerk sequencer engine? Perhaps as the new high-end 
	sequencer/controller?
	
	Joe
	
	
	To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
	doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
	
	
	
	Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . 
	



-------------------------------------------------------------- --
        Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for more
information and to register, visit http://www.reuters.com/messaging

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: NEW INFO FROM DOEPFER ABOUT NAMM 2003 AND MORE!!!

2003-02-04 by ringmod45 <ringmod45@yahoo.com>

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, David Salter <david.salter@r...> 
wrote:
> Yep, I agree Joe, 4 octs max plus the points I raised earlier
> 

good point. another idea would be to add a 3-way switch to scale the 
octave up or down for a greater range.

RM

 
>  
> 
> David Salter 
> Reuters Consulting 
> Tel: +44 20 7542 2402 
> Mob: +44 7990562402 
> Fax: +44 20 7542 2699 
> 
> 	-----Original Message-----
> 	From: Joe Buechler <buechlerjoe@t...>
> [mailto:buechlerjoe@t...] 
> 	Sent: 03 February 2003 14:42
> 	To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> 	Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: NEW INFO FROM DOEPFER ABOUT NAMM
> 2003 AND MORE!!!
> 	
> 	
> 	
> 	> Many people also aked
> 	> for a "normal" CV/Gate keyboard with 4 or 5 octaves
> 	> with the same features as the touch keyboard. 
> 	> ... In every case we will
> 	> also develop a "normal" CV/Gate keyboard as the
> 	> inquiries for such a keyboard are more than we
> 	> expected. 
> 	
> 	My checkbook has been open, waiting, since this suggestion 
first
> 
> 	appeared here on the forum. If you build it, I'll buy it. 
> 	
> 	I think 3-4 octaves instead of 4-5 octaves would position it 
as
> an 
> 	affordable alternative to the Voyager, for those who already
> have an 
> 	analog synth engine, CV and/or midi.
> 	
> 	> Also a small version of the
> 	> Schaltwerk features (trigger sequencer with 16 steps/8
> 	> tracks with buttons and LEDs, but only one track is
> 	> visible at a time - this will keep the price low, the
> 	> desired track could be selected with additional
> 	> buttons or an encoder, several LED displays to show
> 	> the track/sequence and so on). 
> 	
> 	How ironic. This is what I *thought* I was buying in the
> Regelwerk, 
> 	for precisely the reasons that Dieter describes. 
Unfortunately, 
> 	Doepfer seriously hobbled the Regelwerk by only including 
about
> 90% of 
> 	the Schaltwerk sequencer engine, leaving out some very key
> features.
> 	
> 	If the small version of the Schaltwerk is produced, bravo, but
> where 
> 	will that leave me? Stranded, that's where. I'm *very* fond of
> those 
> 	faders :-)
> 	
> 	Maybe the Regelwerk could also be upgraded to include the
> remainder of 
> 	the Schaltwerk sequencer engine? Perhaps as the new high-end 
> 	sequencer/controller?
> 	
> 	Joe
> 	
> 	
> 	To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> 	doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> 	
> 	
> 	
> 	Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . 
> 	
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------- --
>         Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
> 
> Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for 
more
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> information and to register, visit http://www.reuters.com/messaging
> 
> Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
> sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
> the views of Reuters Ltd.
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.