RE: [Doepfer_a100] Re: not other OSC and worst modules
2003-03-25 by David Salter
I love the 121, I have two of them, warm and creamy. Ethan, you absolutely right about levels, it is very easy to distort the signal in a patch (although it can be good to do so). regards David Salter Reuters Consulting Tel: +44 20 7542 2402 Mob: +44 7990562402 Fax: +44 20 7542 2699
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: ethanzer0 [mailto:ethanzer0@yahoo.com]
Sent: 25 March 2003 12:37
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: not other OSC and worst modules
--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "code_pig" <code_pig@y...> wrote:
>> and the 121 multimode filter is
>> simply the WORST sounding filter
>> I have ever heard,and can´t be
>> compared to other brand ones.
>> I´m not bashing Doepfer as I have
>> 6 panels if their modules but some
>> of them are the WORST out there
>>
I have to disagree with you on these
points. I suggest turning down the
output or inputs on all of your
modules in a patch. I used to feel the
way you did until I realized my entire
signal path was distorted due to cranking
up the inputs and outputs too high.
Ethan
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=246920.2960106.4328965.2848452/D=egroupweb/S=1705032144:HM/A=1464858/R=0/*http://www.gotomypc.com/u/tr/yh/cpm/grp/300_Cquo_1/g22lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl>
<http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=246920.2960106.4328965.2848452/D=egroupmail/S=:HM/A=1464858/rand=819820052>
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
-------------------------------------------------------------- --
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for more
information and to register, visit http://www.reuters.com/messaging
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]