Doepfer

Well, no matter what the options, all I can say is:

I WANT ONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

-bunny

In a message dated 1/10/2002 8:59:15 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com writes:


> you can vote for more than one choices in this poll!!o.k.??
> synthfreak
> 



hi ! 
comment on the poll - 
i noticed it didn`t include the simpler option of 1 voice / monophonic  this 
might be good to include as i`d favor a less expensive device and eliminating 
the circuit overheard of polyphonic operation would certainly contribute to 
this goal.

best,
dave




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

hi dave,
yes,but i can't change it now...if i do all the
results so far will be lost...sorry
synthfreak

--- davevosh@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 1/10/2002 8:59:15 AM Eastern
> Standard Time, 
> synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com writes:
> 
> 
> > you can vote for more than one choices in this
> poll!!o.k.??
> > synthfreak
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> hi ! 
> comment on the poll - 
> i noticed it didn`t include the simpler option of 1
> voice / monophonic  this 
> might be good to include as i`d favor a less
> expensive device and eliminating 
> the circuit overheard of polyphonic operation would
> certainly contribute to 
> this goal.
> 
> best,
> dave
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
> 
> 


=====
synthfreak(parallel worlds)
athens-greece
[Doepfer_a100] group owner-moderator

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/

Hi Dave.
I agree totally with you -as my A-100 is set-up only as a monophonic 
machine an probably never will get polyphonic. (I find multitracking 
better than multiplying modules to get polyphony)
Keld
 
> hi ! 
> comment on the poll - 
> i noticed it didn`t include the simpler option of 1 voice / 
monophonic  this 
> might be good to include as i`d favor a less expensive device and 
eliminating 
> the circuit overheard of polyphonic operation would certainly 
contribute to 

> this goal.
> 
> best,
> dave
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]