New modules
2001-07-25 by rober37950@aol.com
I would like to see a new VCO. A sine wave array would be great. A VC wave form type would be cool too. An 8 pole latter filter would be cool, but I think 105 being planned is a bit bland.
Thread
New modules
Re: [Doepfer_a100] New modules
2001-07-26 by bakis S
--- rober37950@aol.com wrote: > I would like to see a new VCO. A sine wave array > would be great. A > VC wave form type would be cool too. An 8 pole > latter filter would > be cool, but I think 105 being planned is a bit > bland. > > hi! a sine wave array...you mean a sine wave osc bank?i agree!!and what about the triple resonance filter module??will it ever be rereleased?it must be really great!an envelope with more parameters???an ARP2600 filter module??any other ideas/wishes??? synthfreak athens-greece __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
Re: New modules
2015-01-18 by a11@live.nl
I'm very exited about A-110-4 QVCO and also (less) about the new VC LFO.
I like the FM sound a lot and with those QVCO's it would be top FM-ing.
Now my new wish is a Voltage Controlled Reverb, including vc of the mix-parameter.
It does not have to be so extended as the Erbeverb, which is too expensive.
There are other ones on the market now, but I want a Doepfer one.
Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] New modules
2015-01-23 by Nicholas Keller
I have a reverb with CV control of Mix and it really is less useful than you would think. What I prefer is to have voltage control over the "send" level. I achieve this by placing a VCA before the reverb and a mixer after, but I think Doepfer makes a module specificly for this (FX/Crossfade, or something like that). The difference is that when you turn the mix from wet to dry, you are lowering the volume of the reverb tail. If you instead control the level going IN to the reverb, then you hear the entire tail. Try doing this on a mixer with send and returns. First manually adjust the return with the send up, then try adjusting the send with the return up. Which do you prefer?
On Saturday, January 17, 2015, a11@live.nl [Doepfer_a100] <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Nick
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Saturday, January 17, 2015, a11@live.nl [Doepfer_a100] <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
I'm very exited about A-110-4 QVCO and also (less) about the new VC LFO.
I like the FM sound a lot and with those QVCO's it would be top FM-ing.
Now my new wish is a Voltage Controlled Reverb, including vc of the mix-parameter.
It does not have to be so extended as the Erbeverb, which is too expensive.
There are other ones on the market now, but I want a Doepfer one.
Re: [Doepfer_a100] New modules
2015-01-23 by Florian Anwander
Video from NAMM: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_oD1291PEM
Re: New modules
2015-01-29 by a11@live.nl
Thanks for your reply, Nick.
Yes, I get it. I standard use the second, by adjusting the send with the return (almost full) up.
But it's not a bad thing to have vc of the Mix-knob. I mean, it's time now to have Full Modulation Design in the Modular World. For Modular is not yet mature.
You know what also is very effective.
That is to vc the Pre-Delay parameter.
Ben
Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] New modules
2015-01-29 by Nicholas Keller
I see, I thought we were talking about spring reverbs... In the case of DSP, certainly everything should be controllable
On Wednesday, January 28, 2015, a11@live.nl [Doepfer_a100] <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Nick
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Wednesday, January 28, 2015, a11@live.nl [Doepfer_a100] <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Thanks for your reply, Nick.
Yes, I get it. I standard use the second, by adjusting the send with the return (almost full) up.
But it's not a bad thing to have vc of the Mix-knob. I mean, it's time now to have Full Modulation Design in the Modular World. For Modular is not yet mature.
You know what also is very effective.
That is to vc the Pre-Delay parameter.
Ben