Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Thread

New modules

New modules

2001-07-25 by rober37950@aol.com

I would like to see a new VCO.  A sine wave array would be great. A 
VC wave form type would be cool too.  An 8 pole latter filter would 
be cool, but I think 105 being planned is a bit bland.

Re: [Doepfer_a100] New modules

2001-07-26 by bakis S

--- rober37950@aol.com wrote:
> I would like to see a new VCO.  A sine wave array
> would be great. A 
> VC wave form type would be cool too.  An 8 pole
> latter filter would 
> be cool, but I think 105 being planned is a bit
> bland.
> 
> hi!
a sine wave array...you mean a sine wave osc bank?i
agree!!and what about the triple resonance filter
module??will it ever be rereleased?it must be really
great!an envelope with more parameters???an ARP2600
filter module??any other ideas/wishes???
synthfreak
athens-greece


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/

Re: New modules

2015-01-18 by a11@live.nl

I'm very exited about A-110-4 QVCO and also (less) about the new VC LFO.

I like the FM sound a lot and with those QVCO's it would be top FM-ing.


Now my new wish is a Voltage Controlled Reverb, including vc of the mix-parameter.

It does not have to be so extended as the Erbeverb, which is too expensive.

There are other ones on the market now, but I want a Doepfer one.

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] New modules

2015-01-23 by Nicholas Keller

I have a reverb with CV control of Mix and it really is less useful than you would think. What I prefer is to have voltage control over the "send" level. I achieve this by placing a VCA before the reverb and a mixer after, but I think Doepfer makes a module specificly for this (FX/Crossfade, or something like that). The difference is that when you turn the mix from wet to dry, you are lowering the volume of the reverb tail. If you instead control the level going IN to the reverb, then you hear the entire tail. Try doing this on a mixer with send and returns. First manually adjust the return with the send up, then try adjusting the send with the return up. Which do you prefer?

Nick



Show quoted textHide quoted text

On Saturday, January 17, 2015, a11@live.nl [Doepfer_a100] <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

I'm very exited about A-110-4 QVCO and also (less) about the new VC LFO.

I like the FM sound a lot and with those QVCO's it would be top FM-ing.


Now my new wish is a Voltage Controlled Reverb, including vc of the mix-parameter.

It does not have to be so extended as the Erbeverb, which is too expensive.

There are other ones on the market now, but I want a Doepfer one.

Re: New modules

2015-01-29 by a11@live.nl

Thanks for your reply, Nick.


Yes, I get it. I standard use the second, by adjusting the send with the return (almost full) up.

But it's not a bad thing to have vc of the Mix-knob. I mean, it's time now to have Full Modulation Design in the Modular World. For Modular is not yet mature.


You know what also is very effective.

That is to vc the Pre-Delay parameter.



Ben


Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] New modules

2015-01-29 by Nicholas Keller

I see, I thought we were talking about spring reverbs... In the case of DSP, certainly everything should be controllable

Nick



Show quoted textHide quoted text

On Wednesday, January 28, 2015, a11@live.nl [Doepfer_a100] <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Thanks for your reply, Nick.


Yes, I get it. I standard use the second, by adjusting the send with the return (almost full) up.

But it's not a bad thing to have vc of the Mix-knob. I mean, it's time now to have Full Modulation Design in the Modular World. For Modular is not yet mature.


You know what also is very effective.

That is to vc the Pre-Delay parameter.



Ben


Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.