Doepfer

Enter your vote today!  A new poll has been created for the 
Doepfer_a100 group:

To what extent do you think Doepfer 
should try to fix flaws and bugs in 
the product line? 

  o Nothing is more paramount. Bugs should be fixed first of all. 
  o If the users specificly asks for it to be fixed and want to pay for the upgrade it should be done at once otherwise it can wait. 
  o Faults should be fixed as soon as possible and superceed development of new modules unless users demand new modules. 
  o It depends on the nature of the flaw. Serious flaws at once others can wait. 
  o If it is questionable if it is a bug or a useful feature it is up to the maker to decide. 
  o In general I think it should be fixed within a year 
  o In general I think it should be fixed within a two years. 
  o In general I think it should be fixed in a time shoosen by the maker. 
  o Well, I say it is up to the buyer to check if the unit holds up to its promise. No it shouldn't be fixed unless it is written down in the manual. 
  o No. I prefer more stuff to be developed instead. 


To vote, please visit the following web page:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/polls 

Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are 
not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups 
web site listed above.

Thanks!