Re: [Doepfer_a100] Confusing to me, David.
2002-02-28 by david.salter@reuters.com
Hi Andreas,
I do not mean to confuse.
What I meant to say was that in an ideal world I would prefer to have a high quality controller and the option to incorporate a fully featured sequencer as an upgrade option to the touch keyboard.
What ever the final production unit looks like, I'll but one anyway, just for the touch keyboard.
Regards
David
Andreas Lindholm
<andreas.k.lindholm@ To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
telia.com> cc: Show quoted textHide quoted text
Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Confusing to me, David.
27/02/2002 17:19 Header: Internal Use Only
Please respond to
Doepfer_a100
To what do you agree? That it should be built in or that it would better off
as an expansion that has a new set of features that matches the rest of the
TBK?
Glad I am not Dieter D, there are a lot of disparent vishes here ;)
/Andreas
----- Original Message -----
From: <david.salter@reuters.com>
>
> I agree that if a sequencer is to be incorporated into the touch keyboard
it has to be fully integrated.
>
> The point that has been made by some people, myself included is that it
can be an add on and it would have to offer more than a155 (just as you
intimate).
>
> David
>
>
>
> bakis Sirros
> <synth_freak_2000@ To:
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> yahoo.com> cc:
> Subject: Re:
[Doepfer_a100] A little about that touch keyboard
> 27/02/2002 13:47 Header: Internal Use
Only
> Please respond to
> Doepfer_a100
>
>
>
>
>
> ooooooo.......don't you understand that this sequencer
> NEEDS to be with the sensor keyboard???the keys of the
> keyboard are used for activating steps/changing
> seq.lenght on the fly!!!so,it is nessessary to have a
> touch-sensor keyboard/sequencer!!!!!!!!!
> synthfreak
>
> --- davevosh@aol.com wrote:
> > In a message dated 2/26/2002 12:12:07 PM Eastern
> > Standard Time,
> > andreas.k.lindholm@telia.com writes:
> >
> >
> > > If the touch keyboard would amount to anything
> > good I would say that it
> > > should either exclude all sequencer functions or
> > they should be very
> > > carefully thought out. There is as far as I
> > understand it no point in adding
> > > something that if very limited when there are
> > several other solutions to do
> > > it better.
> >
> >
> >
> > hello !
> > i must agree here wholeheartedly ! better a
> > superior touch kybd / controller
> > than a mediocre sequencer. after the kybd is
> > completed, take a second look a
> > sequencing and envelope generation using something
> > still visionary, even
> > after all these years, like the old buchla multiple
> > arbitrary random function
> > generator as a conceptual starting point.
> > let each module "be what it is" and avoid "creeping
> > feature-itis" ..........
> > best,
> > dave
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been
> > removed]
> >
> >
>
>
> =====
> synthfreak(parallel worlds)
> athens-greece
> [Doepfer_a100] group owner-moderator
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
>
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------- ---
> Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
>
> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
> sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
> the views of Reuters Ltd.
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
-------------------------------------------------------------- --
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.