Patches and discussion for Ensoniq VFX family

**ding ding**

And the fight is on!!

LOL, actually kids, it goes something like this: Fabio is real familiar and comfy with his rig without the use of the Ensoniq sequencer. IF, and I do mean IF we were able to talk him into getting acquainted with his Ensoniq (like we really concern ourselves to this degree about someone elses use of their own hardware....) he might post back to the group that he absolutely hates it! Seems to me that us old-timers who used the VFX-SD's and SD-1's sequencer when they first came out were the ones that truly got hooked. That was in the day when computers were way pricey, under-powered, and p.c. and Mac based sequencing software was pretty laughable. So Ensoniq's sequencers to "us" were HUGE and powerful!! Today, there are just so many more options. The MPC's are beasts! Personally, I used a Roland MC500 MKII (before I had my 1st EPS) with 2 separate banks of 16 tracks. Man I loved that thing. Also, if Fabio is more into grooves or push and play creations
 (with a bunch-o preset 'helper tracks'...or whatever, he prolly would never take to the Ensoniq sequencers.

Hey, unrelated-- anyone interested in posting some old Ensoniq sequences they threw down "in the day"...just for fun? Is it possible to upload MP3s? Obviously, you would want to post only what you might have copyrighted. Maybe this isn't even allowed here...Richard could straighten me up if I'm out of line. I got loads and loads of cool stuff I did on my VFX-SD and SD-1 that I would have fun sharing. (Yup, it's all copyrighted.) Just curious. Maybe it's a stupid idea....


Best regards,
David 




________________________________
From: audiosaucer <clauzii@...>
To: Ensoniq-VFX-SD@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, January 10, 2010 9:03:18 AM
Subject: [Ensoniq-VFX-SD] ensoniq sequencers [Re: Good VFX-SD Stories]

  
@ Fabio:
I don't think You know the Sequencer of the VFX-SD very well then. Most of the things You describe can be done. I'm able to lay down a whole song on a VFX-SD in 10 minutes too. Also, the step sequencing is indeed possible AND easy to use.

I'm not trying to make some kind of competition out of this, but the VFX-SD is very capable in the sequencing department. And one of (if not THE) easiest to use at all..

Best,
Claus, DK

--- In Ensoniq-VFX- SD@yahoogroups. com, "somethingkillingyo u" <somethingkillingyo u@...> wrote:
>
> @Vince
> 
> raven's and sirius sequencers are perfect for live performance, you can say they have been made for that! 
> VERY user friendly! I can do a whole songs in 10 minutes (I mean I can SEQUENCE a song in 10 minutes... the composing part is not being considered here)
> you can select patterns in realtime with dedicated buttons; you can mute and transpose any pattern's track in realtime, and each track has its button; you also get advanced argpeggiators, but I have to recognize that if you play in a church those won't be used on a daily basis :)
> of course you can chain your patterns to create a whole song... also, programmed songs can be changed while they're playing: you can skip or repeat the song step that is playing, so the song can be longer / shorter etc.
> 
> @ svbeats
> 
> never used an MPC, anyway it's just for simplicity's sake that I use quasimidi sequencers!
> the fact that you can use a drumgrid for drum parts and a step sequencer for synth parts and record arpeggiated parts in the sequencer is of vital importance to me! 
> of course you can also record in realtime and quantize, but sometimes you wouldn't want to, like with drum parts or punchy robotic basslines...
> also, you can have your own arpeggiator patterns, which can be similar to a step sequencer, they're fully editable!
> 
> ensoniq has none of those options!
> 
> 
> greetings
> 
> Fabio
>