Phil wrote: > What it boils down is that there are lots of ways of getting the same > result with relatively the same level of efficiency. yep, and each of us has a preferred choice on what system to use. > One other thing I haven't seen discussed is the effect of etching > speed on pinholing with TT. I think (though have no way to prove it) > that pinholing is proportional to etch time. It seems to work out > that way. The last batch (the one I mentioned) had almost no > pinholing at all. I was very pleased with the result. Even under the > microscope, it looked suprisingly clean for TT. > As I understand the "pinholes" are just small voids in the toner coating the copper. How can this effect etching rate , which is governed by a chemical reaction ?
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Regenerating CuCl
2005-09-06 by Adam Seychell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.