I can tell you for sure I'm using 1/1 oz material because I have weighed it out. I also have a bunch of .5/.5 and it is noticably lighter. Haven't etched it though. I could have made up a weaker batch of FeCl. I followed the directions on the package but 12+ mins at room temp sounds about right for what we are talking. Your AP is a bit weaker than the literature that came with mine recommends (80% of mine - 250 g/L). --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Adam Seychell <a_seychell@y...> wrote: > Thats interesting your experience were different than what I measured in > my test. The bubbles agitation for my test was very vigorous, so maybe > that had something to do with it. The FeCl3 was full strength as sold > industrially (sp.gr=1.47), the AP was 200g/l almost fresh (very faint > blue color due to previous tests). For AP I was getting about 9 minutes > with 1oz copper at 42°C. 5 minutes sounds fast! Two possible reasons: > you unknowingly have "1/2 oz" PCB material, or the ferric chloride you > were using was for some reason not very potent which made it slow in > comparison. I'm equally curious becuase it could mean my test results > are botched. > > If you have access to a micrometer caliper, you can peal copper away > from the board using a heat gun and pair of pliers, burn off the > remaining epoxy stuck to the back of the foil, and measure its thickness > > Adam > > > > Phil wrote: > > > Very nice site! It would have been very helpfull when I was trying CuCl. > > > > One question, you have a chart that shows AP as generally having about > > 1/4 the etching rate of CuCl and worse than 1/5 the rate of FeCl for a > > given temperature. What was your AP concentration? My experiences > > with AP and FeCl are significantly different from that. Just > > yesterday I etched a 2.5"X3.5" DS 1 oz board in 5 minutes. 1 L of AP > > (250G/L per the directions on the package) heated to about 45C. This > > etchant is getting a bit old - I've done about 10 similar sized boards > > in it so it may even be faster with fresh etchant. This was > > significantly faster than the FeCl etching that I have done at room > > temp (12-14 minutes at 25C approx from memory). I recall room temp AP > > took a little longer than FeCl but not appreciably. I'm mostly > > curious since I'm very happy with AP. > > > > Phil > >
Message
Re: CuCl etchig web page
2005-09-16 by Phil
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.