Russell Shaw wrote: >>Phil wrote: >> >> >> >>>Very nice site! It would have been very helpfull when I was trying CuCl. > > > ... > Adam Seychell wrote: > > Thats interesting your experience were different than what I measured in > > my test. The bubbles agitation for my test was very vigorous, so maybe > > that had something to do with it. The FeCl3 was full strength as sold > > industrially (sp.gr=1.47), the AP was 200g/l almost fresh (very faint > > blue color due to previous tests). For AP I was getting about 9 minutes > > with 1oz copper at 42\ufffdC. 5 minutes sounds fast! Two possible reasons: > > you unknowingly have "1/2 oz" PCB material, or the ferric chloride you > > were using was for some reason not very potent which made it slow in > > comparison. I'm equally curious becuase it could mean my test results > > are botched. > > > > If you have access to a micrometer caliper, you can peal copper away > > from the board using a heat gun and pair of pliers, burn off the > > remaining epoxy stuck to the back of the foil, and measure its thickness > > > > Adam > > Ferric chloride works faster if it is diluted with water (to 1 part or 2 > parts water). A properly cleaned 35um copper pcb should etch in 5 minutes > at room temperature with gentle/moderate bubble agitation. > yep, 5~6 minutes sounds ok for FeCl. But I didn't think AP at 45\ufffdC wouldn't be that fast as Phil is finding, maybe at 70\ufffdC however. > http://www.jtbaker.com/msds/englishhtml/f1060.htm Thats a good link on FeCl. They say diluting 1 part FeCl (sp.gr 1.47) to 2 parts water doesn't effect etch rate. I didn't try diluting it. I can't be bothered repeating all the experiments again :(. Adam
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: CuCl etchig web page
2005-09-16 by Adam Seychell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.