----- Original Message ----- From: "derekhawkins" <derekhawkins@...> To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 6:01 PM Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: A $500.00 "UV" non-trivial exposure box..... > >In your opinion, not mine. I'm not discussing it further, i've made my >>point. > > If you were not able to achieve faster and consistently better results > using photoetching then you never mastered the process due to one > reason or another. It's as simple as that. I've tried both TT and photo-etching, and much prefer the latter. Admittedly, I only used a clothes iron for the TT rather than a laminator, but I couldn't see the point of getting a fairly expensive piece of equipment that might not work when a simple home-made UV exposure unit would cost a lot less and give better results. Leon --- [This E-mail has been scanned for viruses but it is your responsibility to maintain up to date anti virus software on the device that you are currently using to read this email. ]
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: A $500.00 "UV" non-trivial exposure box.....
2005-11-16 by Leon Heller
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.