Yahoo Groups archive

Homebrew PCBs

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:05 UTC

Message

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Question: using surface mount resistors/caps ?

2006-01-31 by Mike Young

I think he might mean stencils. The answer is still the same: few of us and 
it doesn't make much difference. The stencil's job is to mask the paste into 
an even thickness only where it's needed. Typically, the stencil is 3 to 5 
mil thick. Adding the solder mask thickness, it leaves about 8 mil of paste 
on the pads after troweling off.

Why might you not need a stencil? Conversely, why are they used if you can 
do without? Very briefly: surface tension, and manual application versus 
automated production line. Apply the paste where it's needed, not too much 
and not too little. Bridging isn't a concern. Experiment a little. Prove it 
to yourself.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stefan Trethan" <stefan_trethan@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Question: using surface mount 
resistors/caps ?


> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:20:01 +0100, derekhawkins <eldata@...> wrote:
>
>>> You could also use paste and reflow if appearance is an issue, it
>>
>>> self-centers exactly due to surface tension and looks perfect.
>>
>>
>> No kidding! How many of us are reflowing on boards without solder
>>
>> masks?
>
>
> Most of us, actually, i guess ;-)
>
> Of those that using smd paste that is.
>
> Why would you think you need soldermask?

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.