I think he might mean stencils. The answer is still the same: few of us and it doesn't make much difference. The stencil's job is to mask the paste into an even thickness only where it's needed. Typically, the stencil is 3 to 5 mil thick. Adding the solder mask thickness, it leaves about 8 mil of paste on the pads after troweling off. Why might you not need a stencil? Conversely, why are they used if you can do without? Very briefly: surface tension, and manual application versus automated production line. Apply the paste where it's needed, not too much and not too little. Bridging isn't a concern. Experiment a little. Prove it to yourself. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Trethan" <stefan_trethan@...> To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 12:21 PM Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Question: using surface mount resistors/caps ? > On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:20:01 +0100, derekhawkins <eldata@...> wrote: > >>> You could also use paste and reflow if appearance is an issue, it >> >>> self-centers exactly due to surface tension and looks perfect. >> >> >> No kidding! How many of us are reflowing on boards without solder >> >> masks? > > > Most of us, actually, i guess ;-) > > Of those that using smd paste that is. > > Why would you think you need soldermask?
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Question: using surface mount resistors/caps ?
2006-01-31 by Mike Young
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.