>Hi Alan, nice to meet you, I'm Richard, the OP. >The problem falls into section 3. I'm making a PCI-104 board with a >lot of high count surface mount parts, and I need at least 4 layers, >and probably 6. > > Nope, definitely not #3. #2. 'Problem' refers to your 'unresolvable problem' within Eagle. Your problem is easily and clearly marked as is the solution, send in $400 for the Layout and Schematic license. To short circuit the loop, "I don't want to send in $400, or I don't have the $400 to send.." Fine, that is your choice and is ok. But in no way shape or form does it actually constitute an unresolvable problem within Eagle, as you characterized it in your OP.. It has limits, but they're clearly marked, and wanting to do something that goes beyond them doesn't even really constitute a problem with Eagle, and isn't unresolvable. Point being, Eagle is relatively solid and has extremely few real problems vs its large array of functions. Someone taking your advice at point blank value is about 100 times more likely to hit a far more real, unresolvable problem in what you're suggesting as an alternative. While it may be better if you want to do a free 4 layer board and aren't using advanced options, or some other rather specific thing, it is rather not likely to be the superior overall choice for what many people do, especially if it's still in some teething phase. Once you get beyond learning the interface, you hit very few problems within Eagle, and almost any are easily worked around due to the nature of how Eagle is built at the lowest level. There are plenty of valid gripes with Eagle and the interface, but hinting like some mysterious problem is going to stop people cold if they start using it isn't valid.. Alan
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: New Scematic capture & PCB software
2006-02-14 by Alan King
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.