--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "kilocycles" <kilocycles@...> wrote: > > That's just great. I got the Brother 2040 to get *away* from the > freakin' copy machine! > > Ted The new Brother MFC line (I tried about three types) are the only printer I could not get to transfer at /all/ with the iron or the laminator when I was still testing transparencies. I have not tried it with the laser photo paper, but I suspect the fuser temperature is much higher than other laser printers. Both Canon and HP laser personal copiers worked perfectly well with press'n'peel. I did not get any perfect transfers with transparencies. The toner density on these seemed too low, it needs the extra layer of press'n'peel (or green TRF) to etch properly. I'd stay away from Brother printers after this, their new models must have a completely redesigned toner system. I have not tried any home color laser printers. However, I do notice that the black toner in a color laser photocopier tends to be much, much denser and even than the black in a monochrome copier. I suspect this is because it needs to be 'better' in order to print good quality copies of photos, etc. With a black printer, you're not going to notice if the toner isn't as solid and glossy, especially if you're just using it for text on paper. I would suspect that a home color laser would also be like this.
Message
Re: Toner transfer - un-even surface theory...
2006-03-04 by fenrir_co
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.