I started with photo-resist PCB, I found it to be very expensive, that's why I switched to toner transfer. Yeah, it's more tedious trying to pass paper through a printer, but I save money in the long run and right now that is a concern. Now if you would point me to a source of photo-resist liquid that I could just spray onto copper-clad PCB, I'd reconsider the whole thing. But you're still faced with the same alignment problems with double-sided PCBs. My solution would be to use transparencies, tape them into a sandwich and use a double-sided exposure setup. I used transparencies on my laser printers and was very satisfied with the results. But you also have to deal with one extra chemical. I just like to explore all avenues first, and then make a decision after I've heard reports on 'all' techniques. Right now toner transfer is my favourite, but if I can print directly onto thin substrate, I might switch to that technique. But I just won a Epson C84 on EBay for $10.50 this morning and I'm going to test this process. Robert :) -----Message d'origine----- De : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com] De la part de lcdpublishing Envoyé : avril 16 2006 10:24 À : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com Objet : [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: RE : Epson durabrite ink tests - I have ink -no printer... It is kind of funny how some of us refuse to go down the path of photosensitive boards (myself being in this category). I don't know why, I used have a darkroom and develop photos and such. However, using it for PCBs just isn't my "cup of tea" I guess. I believe there will be a variety of options for doing double sided with ink jets. It's just a matter of getting things going and seeing how everything works out.
Message
[Homebrew_PCBs] RE : Epson durabrite ink tests - I have ink -no printer...
2006-04-16 by Robert Hedan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.