> > The goat slaughterer wrote: > > > > But seriously - what I was trying to > > indicate that there is a lot less art (or > > black magic) in photo-developing than > > there is in toner transfer. > Stefen T wrote: > Let's just disagree, shall we? Deal - but arguing endlessly could be a way of filling up my boring days at work :D > I had the exact opposite experience. You had process variation problems with photo ? What part could you not get repeatable ? > It depends which process you get more > proficient at, they are very similar > in the number of involved steps. I think after 5 or 6 years I did get pretty proficient at toner transfer. And I am sure I get a single board in the etchant faster with photo than the amount of time it took me to scrub the copper with Jiff. Yes you pay for that convenience with the fact that Kinsten pre-sensitized boards being more expensive. But I am willing to pay a machine in a factory to do the manual labour of scrubbing boards for me. > That's why we are looking at inkjet > printing. With some luck it would beat > both. Here Here - well said. I agree whole heartedly that inkjet may beat both hands down in manual labour and cost. (just not quality - my precious beloved photo process will always win there :P)
Message
Re: Easy toner transfer using relatively cheap Mall-Wart paper.
2006-05-01 by Andrew
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.