>I still think etch undercut can be an issue No more so than over-exposure or over-development IMO. I actually use undercut to get rid of the inkjet jaggies; Artwork with jaggies; http://www.pbase.com/eldata/image/45947532 Etched board using above (warning: very large image); http://www.pbase.com/eldata/image/46673206/original The etched board looks like it was from laser artwork. The undercut is no greater than the width of the jaggies. Why would the undercut be any greater with a 5 mil track? 6/6 rules artwork snippet; http://www.pbase.com/eldata/image/62430331/original Etched 6/6 snippet from the above; http://www.pbase.com/eldata/image/62430370/original All I'm losing to undercut is the jaggies. Why on earth should I get rid of this bubble etcher in favor of a spray etcher? Was this etched or milled (warning: large image); http://www.pbase.com/eldata/image/57044297/original Bottom line, you shouldn't have to try 6/6 or 5/5 rules in order to determine whether it can be done. You should be able to determine that by inspecting your 10/10 rules results. If the printer is the limitation then the artwork is going to tell you that before having to go any further. --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Adam Seychell <a_seychell@...> wrote: >
Message
Re: printer limitations or etch undercut
2007-04-11 by derekhawkins
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.