On 13/11/2007, Steve <alienrelics@...> wrote: > That is an excellent question. I don't think there is one answer to > that, however I am also very interested in the answer(s). For contract work, I use Protel (well, Altium Designer 6), but I also have older versions of Orcad (came bundled with Specctra) and Pads (bought for me by a customer for one job). The combination of AD6 and Specctra makes most things possible, from titchy single-layer projects to relatively dense open-source stuff like http://www.balloonboard.org/ , to high volume commercial stuff in various technologies. There's no clear winner out there. PCB shops see a lot of desgn packages. I occasionally dip into gEDA, but never convince myself (yet) that I can get a serious project out of the other end without a massive amount of effort - and, in my experience, effort = errors. Automation & automated checking (plus effort) delivers working boards. Trustable libraries matter, too - either my Protel libraries I've built up over the years, or manufacturer libraried. The probability of error on a hand-entered 700+-pin BGA, as well as the catastrophic dullness, means it's a last resort, at best. For boards that can be home-etched, I dunno. Any non-toy package can do them trivially. Some of the macros you'd want to improve yield as far as possible aren't built-in, since they're tactics you wouldn't want to be using for real. Steve
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: PCB DESIGN industry standard
2007-11-13 by Steve Wiseman
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.