You may have mentioned it elsewhere and I did not see it, what are you using for the laminator? --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Markus Zingg <homebrew-pcb@...> wrote: > > Brian, > > The foil actually only is suposed to serve as a carrier for the dry film > laminate on both sides of it. The one I use is less than one mil thick, > and I suggest to use the thinnest one you can get hold of as long as you > manage to laminate it which is not all that hard. Just make sure to feed > your laminator in a direction in which the foil was not originally bent > cause otherwise there is the risk that the foil wraps itself around one > of the rols of the laminator (been there, had to disassemble/reassemble > the laminator :-( ). The extremly thin aluminium foil is also the reason > why the aluminium is etched away almost instantly (with some impressive > bubbling, smoke and even some heat :-) ) when dipping it into Fe3Cl at > those spots where the dry film laminate was developped away. You truly > don't need any air agitation for this etching process. Dipping is > enough. I usually dip it shortly, then rinse and check if still > aluminium is there. Somethimes it's necessairy to stick it back into the > developement bath, then back into the etchant. After two or three cycles > the stencil will be perfect! The dry film then gives the alluminium at > those spots where it's really fine some aditional strenght. I do have a > PC microscope but for some reasons it does not work at the moment, so > the biggest magnification I can do here are my 8 times magnifying > googles and using them I can't tell if there are spots where only > dryfilm is present or if the aluminium is still there. The all important > point though is that even if the aluminium shold be gone, the silk > screenig of the solderpaste works without problems for me. > > I think though that my end resulting stencil is probably not so far away > from a mylar stencil. I never had one, but I figure structures that fine > will break easily anyways no matter what material is used. So care must > be taken not to bend the stencil sharply. I was however amazed to see > how strong it was. The stencil kind of sucked itself to the PCB surface > and I've ben able to rub in all directions to truly evenly spread the > paste. Raising it thereafter was also no problem and thereafter all fine > structures at the stencil were still ok. Needless to say that they were > also present on the PCB. > > You may have noted that I took a plastified card of a cardgame as the > spatula/squeegee. They are IMHO fairly well suited for the job, can even > be cleaned thereafter (reused many times) and dirt cheap (just make sure > you take your sons yugioh (spelling?) or pokemon cards AFTER he grew out > of it!). Since they are made of cardboard, they do not scratch up the > stencil and by bending them more and less you can easily press the > solderpaste down to the PCB. > > The stencil ideally should be 4 mils thick to end up with the propper > amount of solder paste on the pads. Since using my method you end up > with a stencil of that thickness, subsequent soldering is no problem. > > I've so far not been able to clean the stencil after use cause all the > fluids I tried so far destroyed the dryfilm laminate. It's no problem to > use the stencil for multiple PCBs while you are at it. Just if the paste > dries it's (so far) over. However that's really no problem for me cause > I a) anyways only produce prototypes (5 pieces of one PCB is a hughe > quantity! :-) ) and b) since it only takes 15 minutes to creae a new > stencil and since the material costs is close to nothing that doesn't > bother me. The time saved compared to hand soldering, and the perfectly > looking result way outweight it. > > As mentioned elsewhere I'm in the process of creating a website with > tutorials on how I create my PCBs and how all the equipement I use was > made with descriptions and pictures for those intersted in building part > of it on their own etc. etc. I then also will upload sample pictures of > projects done this way. > > Markus > > Brian schrieb: > > > > Never thought of this. Cool idea. You said to use thin foil, when you > > apply the paste do you have a problem with the foil between the pads > > breaking? and if so does it matter since when it reflows it sucks up to > > the pads? Also, using thin foil, is there any problem with having > > enough solder to make a reliable solder joint? Do you have a picture of > > the final board? > > > > Brian > > > > --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com > > <mailto:Homebrew_PCBs%40yahoogroups.com>, Markus Zingg <homebrew-pcb@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi group > > > > > > Under the folowing path in the files section you find a description > > on > > > how to create your own fine pitch stencils. There you also see how to > > > apply solder paste with it. The example given is made with one of the > > > (four layer) PCB's I created here at home. > > > > > > Files </group/Homebrew_PCBs/files/> > PhotoEtching > > > </group/Homebrew_PCBs/files/PhotoEtching/> > solderpaste and stencil > > > > > > I hope this helps others. Enjoy! > > > > > > Markus > > > > > > > >
Message
Re: Need a fine pitch stencil? Here's a method to create your own homebrew high
2008-01-17 by javaguy11111
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.