Many of the of "professional" lab/prototyping PCB exposure units seem to be fitted with a vacuum assisted frame. I'm wondering if vacuum has much advantage over conventional sandwiched rubber foam and glass. These commercial exposure units are built using fluorescent lamps at point blank range. i.e light goes all directions. I could not think of better way to promote light undercut. I'm thinking the vacuum on the more expensive units is put there to help combat non-collimated light. If the light source is reasonably collimated then does vacuum provide much advantage ? Photoresist is about 50um thick. So I guess ideally the photomask should sit flat on the PCB with a air gap no greater than some fraction of the resist thickness.
Message
Exposure with vacuum frame
2008-03-07 by Adam Seychell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.